Analogue-sequencer

Hi Colin

Good idea to seek feedback. I've voted in all the polls.

Regarding the case config vote desktop/rack, I voted rack, but if there was
a "both" option I'd have chosen that.

The flexibility of the P3 in this regard is excellent, I initially used it
desktop for a few years, now use it rackmount. Setups seldom stay the same
forever.

Only thing I'd ask for is a front panel on/off switch. :)



> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
> >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
> >colinfraser_com
> >Sent: 08 February 2010 01:13
> >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Case question
> >
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I'm looking at a couple of different possible approaches to 
> >the production case for Cirklon, but one thing I've never 
> >been too sure about is the popularity of rackmount or 
> >desktop use for P3.
> >I'm going to create a poll here to find out - please take a 
> >few seconds to let me know.
> >
> >As with P3, I want to have a case that can be rackmounted 
> >without losing a U of rack space to the I/O.
> >But the recessed rear connectors on P3 made the case 
> >somewhat more complex (read: expensive) to produce.
> >If you're a rackmount user, please answer the poll on how 
> >important you consider not having connectors eat into your 
> >rack space.
> >
> >For desktop users, I'm interested in your opinion on the 
> >angle of the P3 control panel. 
> >Thanks in advance.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Colin Fraser
> >Sequentix Music Systems Ltd
> >http://www.sequentix.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >