On 08/06/2011 08:03, weston_underwood wrote: > Thanks Colin. Its partly Paul Nagle's fault; he seems to have two P3's in his videos. although, he only ever seems to have one switched on. I appreciate this could be a performance thing. They were usually switched on I think. With the P3 I had 8 tracks and for the kind of over-the-top gratuitous noodling I needed 16. It also meant I could have my synths permanently allocated to tracks on a specific P3 which made it easier to remember how it all hang together. Cirklon currently has 32 tracks that you can allocate freely over 5 MIDI outputs, CV/Gate, USB. Not even I would need two Cirklons, especially as you can name instruments, patterns, tracks etc. and therefore keep track of where you are far easier. There's an awful lot of power/potential, more than with two P3s. > I just thought that it might speed the placement of notes to great interesting syncopation and allow the build up of 'chords' across multiple synths more rapidly. I find 32 tracks is definitely enough, the ideal number I found. Any more and I struggled to keep track of what was were, plus I was forever whizzing around the track pages to get to where I wanted to be. > P3 control surface would do it, but also no doubt rapidly push up the prices for P3's Indeedy. -- Paul --- http://www.softroom.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/WilyEPeyote
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Two Cirklons
2011-06-08 by Paul Nagle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.