> It would be really useful if you could have two kinds of control: > > - Controlling a parameter for the currently selected pattern > - Controlling a parameter for a specific pattern You would need to get that by selecting which track a control was directed to, with a fixed track number, or referenced by the current 'edit track'. You'd need to consider how you address different bars of a pattern, varying resolutions for aux values, etc. > That way with a lots-of-knobs controller like a drehbank you > could set it up to make editing more conventient by gaining > "dedicated" knobs for pitch, vel, whatever, or you could get > the ability to tweak several running patterns at the same > time without switching. Or a mix of the two even... There is definitely a diminishing return with dedicated knobs - at some point, you have to spend more time hunting for each control than it would take just to switch view. I think the Drehbank is at the limit for a usable number of controls. That's especially true if you have use multiple banks. At least it is for my brain. But being able to map 4 rows of controls for note/velo/leng/delay in P3 edit, or a selection of the track values in play mode is on my list. Cheers, Colin
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Two Cirklons
2011-06-08 by Colin Fraser
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.