No pin connector with the standard cirklon, just a blanking plate. I'm not sure but it probs can be retro fitted. It you are remotely interested in cv then having this fitted is a no-brainer. And yes the extra cost does cover the break-out box I believe. > >-----Original Message----- > >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John > >Sent: 09 July 2011 12:37 > >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for > >one mono synth? Opinions? > > > >Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO > >Cirklon gets you? > >Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the > >sequencer or b) an actual external break box ? > > > >If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin > >connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the > >breakout box at a later date....? > > > >John > > > > > > > >--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "John" > ><johnplaiduk@...> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Thanks James. I've realised apart from it's CV/Gate > >output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and > >12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be > >essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras, plus the > >cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + > >kenton Pro Solo Mk2....... > >> > >> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an > >individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for > >any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon > >midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at > >least a few milliseconds of latency. > >> > >> John > >> > >> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "James R. > >Coplin" <james@> wrote: > >> > > >> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the > >Cirklon is 200ukp. > >> > They are a little different but it seems the price > >differential is > >> > close enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a > >> > modular rig or some other monosynth in the future you > >are already > >> > hooked up. I suppose it depends on if the 84ukp savings > >is worth > >> > the integration by having another piece or if the > >savings of 200ukp > >> > is worth not using your monosynth with the Cirklon - > >which seems a > >> > bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your music. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > James R. Coplin > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > >> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John > >> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM > >> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > >> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for > >one mono synth? > >> > Opinions? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and > >just wondering > >> > if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an > >expensive > >> > way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add > >> > another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance. > >> > > >> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV > >> > sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up... > >> > > >> > Any opinions please? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > John > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------ > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?
2011-07-09 by Ditton33
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.