ok, so the next question is: can the CVIO option be ordered and (easily) installed on site or does the Cirklon need to go back to Sequentix ? Ian On Saturday 9 July 2011 at 14:19, Ditton33 wrote: > No pin connector with the standard cirklon, just a blanking plate. > > I'm not sure but it probs can be retro fitted. > > It you are remotely interested in cv then having this fitted is a > no-brainer. And yes the extra cost does cover the break-out box I believe. > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) > > >[mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John > > >Sent: 09 July 2011 12:37 > > >To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) > > >Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for > > >one mono synth? Opinions? > > > > > >Can someone clarify what exactly the extra £200 for the CVIO > > >Cirklon gets you? > > >Is it a) a 25-pin D-connector on the rear panel of the > > >sequencer or b) an actual external break box ? > > > > > >If the standard Cirklon (£999) comes with the 25 pin > > >connector, then it must be possible to "upgrade" and add the > > >breakout box at a later date....? > > > > > >John > > > > > > > > > > > >--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "John" > > ><johnplaiduk@...> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks James. I've realised apart from it's CV/Gate > > >output, the Kenton Pro Solo Mk2 also outputs din sync, and > > >12, 24, or 48 clocks per quarter note which will be > > >essential to drive my LM2 (48 cpqn). These extras, plus the > > >cash saving are steering me towards the CVIO less Cirklon + > > >kenton Pro Solo Mk2....... > > >> > > >> Colin is there a way to "advance" midi timing to an > > >individual Cirklon port? For in my example to compensate for > > >any latency introduced by the the conversion from Cirklon > > >midi out > Kenton > CV/Gate out? That must introduce at > > >least a few milliseconds of latency. > > >> > > >> John > > >> > > >> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com), "James R. > > >Coplin" <james@> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > A Kenton Pro Solo new is 116ukp and the upcharge on the > > >Cirklon is 200ukp. > > >> > They are a little different but it seems the price > > >differential is > > >> > close enough to make the CVIO option reasonable and if you get a > > >> > modular rig or some other monosynth in the future you > > >are already > > >> > hooked up. I suppose it depends on if the 84ukp savings > > >is worth > > >> > the integration by having another piece or if the > > >savings of 200ukp > > >> > is worth not using your monosynth with the Cirklon - > > >which seems a > > >> > bit of a waste but perhaps not depending on your music. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > James R. Coplin > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > From: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) > > >> > [mailto:analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com)] On Behalf Of John > > >> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:37 AM > > >> > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com (mailto:analogue-sequencer%40yahoogroups.com) > > >> > Subject: [analogue-sequencer] CVIO option overkill for > > >one mono synth? > > >> > Opinions? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > I've five midi synths and one CV/Gate mono SH101 and > > >just wondering > > >> > if the Cirklon CVIO option would be overkill.... and an > > >expensive > > >> > way of sequencing just that one synth via this method? I may add > > >> > another mono at a much later date, but that's only 50/50 chance. > > >> > > > >> > Also the CV breakout box seems to be massive with loads of CV > > >> > sockets etc which just won't be used in my set-up... > > >> > > > >> > Any opinions please? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > > > >> > John > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------ > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: CVIO option overkill for one mono synth? Opinions?
2011-07-09 by Ian Mantripp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.