On Monday 19 January 2004 15:52, Colin f wrote: > > If it's the pot, we would have 2 bad pots now. Both > > pot #9 and #13 are still involved. Isn't it very > > unlikely to have two bad pots? > > Yeah, it does seem a bit less likely. > Pot 9 is on 4051 input 0, and pot 13 is on input 4, which > means there's only 1 bit on the address selection > changing between them. Paul M's reported problem & > solution would back that up the theory that it could be a > dodgy connection on the address pin. > Maybe try some contact cleaner on the ribbon cables ? > Or swapping the cable plugs around - it is a bus type > design, so any pot board can use any connector. I have a new contender: step #11 now produces unwanted events, while #9 and #13 are still with us. That's three pots.
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Problem with step 13
2004-01-19 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.