Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Thread

Re: [analogue-sequencer] algorhythm madness

Re: [analogue-sequencer] algorhythm madness

2005-08-29 by darkstr1746@comcast.net

never had too much problems with bugs in the Cyclone but what i did find was that when they crashed, they crashed for good. No fixing these babies. That's why i bought up all i could find for awhile. Haven't tried hooking one up with a P3 yet. But they do make good crazed strangness when hooked up with a Strummer.   : )
kind regards
john duval
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-------------- Original message -------------- 
mmm, good advice guys; split the midi going to the algorhythmic devices and merge it later - and I'm thinking all thyis happens after the P3 -I think thats the right starting point

Nick - are you a cyclone user by chance - I have a question about it which is driving me crazy.....

Richard
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Nick Rothwell 
  To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 9:29 PM
  Subject: Re: [analogue-sequencer] algorhythm madness


  > I have a master P3 controlling a slave P3 and two Korg sampling 
  > electribes.

  I've been wondering about scenarios for recording with a P3 (you know,
  the one I'm going to buy fairly soon so that I know what I'm talking
  about) together with a computer sequencer (perhaps I should say, MIDI
  multitrack recorder). Since the P3 has multiple ganged MIDI outs, then
  one could put the P3 downstream from the computer (so that it takes
  sync), with P3 MIDI outs to slave modules, but with one P3 MIDI out
  back into the computer in case one wants to record the post-P3
  patterns.

  But anyway, back to the original question. The Oberheim Perf/X boxes
  are so buggy and crash-prone that something chaotic is going to happen
  no matter how things are connected up, but I'm not sure I see a lot of
  point to wiring two algorithmic note generators in series, especially
  since they do similar things, and since they both take a few notes in
  and put lots of notes out. I think it would make more sense to run
  them in parallel, perhaps upstream from a MIDI merger.

  -- 

    nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com


  SPONSORED LINKS Music sampler  Midi sequencer  Synthesizer  
        Sampler  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "analogue-sequencer" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     analogue-sequencer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

 Visit your group "analogue-sequencer" on the web.
  
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 analogue-sequencer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.