Analogue-sequencer

Hello,

I have a p3.
And I bought me an electribe emx1, wich will arrive next week.
I want to sequence without the computer.
Now my question;
wich of the two must be the master (clock) the p3 or the emx1?

greetz

ep von haulshoven

Ep,
Either can be the master clock
J ez


  Hello,

  I have a p3.
  And I bought me an electribe emx1, wich will arrive next week.
  I want to sequence without the computer.
  Now my question;
  wich of the two must be the master (clock) the p3 or the emx1?

  greetz

  ep von haulshoven



  


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

or slave both to your DAW for recording...

-JC

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jez Creek [Modulator ESP] 
  To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 5:00 PM
  Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] p3 and emx1


  Ep,
  Either can be the master clock
  J ez

  Hello,

  I have a p3.
  And I bought me an electribe emx1, wich will arrive next week.
  I want to sequence without the computer.
  Now my question;
  wich of the two must be the master (clock) the p3 or the emx1?

  greetz

  ep von haulshoven

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Okay, I knew that, but I tought that there were some experience users with both mchines who can tell me wat the best working situation is.
  

Jesse <jesse@shurhitrecords.com> wrote:
          or slave both to your DAW for recording...

-JC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jez Creek [Modulator ESP] 
To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] p3 and emx1

Ep,
Either can be the master clock
J ez

Hello,

I have a p3.
And I bought me an electribe emx1, wich will arrive next week.
I want to sequence without the computer.
Now my question;
wich of the two must be the master (clock) the p3 or the emx1?

greetz

ep von haulshoven

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



         

 		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

ep hulshof wrote:
> Okay, I knew that, but I tought that there were some experience users with both mchines who can tell me wat the best working situation is.
>   
One of the cool things about having the P3 as master is you can stop 
attached devices manually then use either the P3's run key or Func+Run 
to send a start or restart command at the start of the next global bar. 
So you can drop out your drum parts confident that you can restart them 
at any point, smoothly and bang on time. I use this feature a lot.

There are also P3 aux events to send start/stop/continue which work very 
well with the electribes - you can do those ultra-fast restarted kick 
drum things etc.

Paul

---
www.softroom.co.uk / www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Paul Nagle <softroom@...>
wrote:
> One of the cool things about having the P3 as master is you can stop 
> attached devices manually then use either the P3's run key or Func+Run 
> to send a start or restart command at the start of the next global bar. 
> So you can drop out your drum parts confident that you can restart them 
> at any point, smoothly and bang on time. I use this feature a lot.

I also find the P3 to be the better master and I'm running both an
ER-1 and ES-1, and I've just started using the breakdown tips Paul
mentions above and they are fabulous.

-Jim (whose first CD featuring P3 work is a day or two away from
sending off to press!)
www.myspace.com/jimcombs
www.myspace.com/sensitivechaos
www.touchxtone.com