Re: [analogue-sequencer] was reading a post back in april ( re:will / p3 / polymorph)
2006-12-20 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
yea it's only 8 steps but you can string the steps together ( 16 sets of 8 steps ). Yea, it's a hair puller but once you ge used to it it's not so bad. Even though i couldn't get on with the P3, it's functionality was far greater than the Signal Arts. So take that Paul!!. . see. . i'm coming to the P3s defense. .. ..Ha!!! LMAO!! Actualy dude, if i don't stop reading your posts i may just have to bite the bullet and try the machine one more time. Grrrrrrr !!!!! you villan!! Grrrrrrr hahaha warm regards john duval . . . .i couldn't get to the sunday morning mp3 files even though i found the bogusfocus page ok. Hmmm ????
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-------------- Original message -------------- From: Paul Nagle <softroom@btinternet.com> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:04:05 -0000, "lobit12" <lobit12@yahoo.com> wrote: >talking about manual, independent triggering of tracks, great idea. >there's a new device called signal arts m.a.p.s. that does it now too, >but its only 8 step sequencing, you can also control transposition and >other sequence data from a midi controller. p3 needs that. You know you can already remote control P3 transposition and other things like track mutes etc.? Have you tried recording into a P3 track whilst other tracks grab data from that track? Or use the track into which you record to push data into a different one? Loads of things to explore - things that make the P3 unique. It could be worth finding out everything the P3 can do (I haven't managed that yet!) then emailing signal arts... or buying both sequencers :) Have fun! Paul --- Paul Nagle - Joint Intelligence Committee - www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]