Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re:P4 editor
2007-05-16 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
I sold my P3 over a year ago for the usual Luddite reasons that everyone has come to recognize as peculiar to me. . .that is to say, bone headed. LOL I still follow the threads that show up about this machine and it suddenly hit me over the head today that i was hasty and foolish to sell mine when i did. In short, i totaly realize the extent of my blockheadedness. : ) One day i'll have the scratch at the same time someone is selling and i'll have another go. In the meantime, it's wonderful to read the posts and the babble from everyone. kind regards john d
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Nick Rothwell <nick@cassiel.com> > > On 16 May 2007, at 15:01, PAUL NAGLE wrote: > > > For me, I have to say music took its largest downward turn when > > visual representation and editing became elements to consider. > > Yeah ... didn't I write a Sound On Sound editorial about this ... > erm ... over a decade ago? > > I can see that I might like a little "reporter" display on a computer > that would tell me what I had set up in the P3 in terms of tracks, > auxes and the like, but I think it would be a mistake to allow the > computer to edit the P3's data rather than use the physical controls > - otherwise, why have a P3 at all? > > > Nick Rothwell / Cassiel.com Limited > www.cassiel.com > www.myspace.com/cassieldotcom > www.loadbang.net > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]