Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Thread

Colin, thought you might like this

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by Nick Rothwell

On 18 Nov 2008, at 01:30, Jim Combs wrote:

> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html

If this is actually doing what it seems to be doing, I'm very  
impressed...

(What next: a P3 sequencer in my web browser?)

	-- N.


Nick Rothwell / Cassiel.com Limited
www.cassiel.com
www.myspace.com/cassieldotcom
www.last.fm/music/cassiel
www.reverbnation.com/cassiel
www.linkedin.com/in/cassiel
www.loadbang.net

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by Colin Fraser

> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html

An impressive bit of coding, but given that I have most of that stuff in
hardware form, spending any time on hobnox would be akin to playing Tomb
Raider while Angelina Jolie was waiting for me in the bedroom.

Cheers,
Colin

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by Nick Rothwell

On 18 Nov 2008, at 12:32, Colin Fraser wrote:

> ut given that I have most of that stuff in
> hardware form, spending any time on hobnox would be akin to playing  
> Tomb
> Raider while Angelina Jolie was waiting for me in the bedroom.

The problem with hardware is that it can be high-maintenance.

Possibly true of Ms. Jolie as well, for all I know.

	-- N.


Nick Rothwell / Cassiel.com Limited
www.cassiel.com
www.myspace.com/cassieldotcom
www.last.fm/music/cassiel
www.reverbnation.com/cassiel
www.linkedin.com/in/cassiel
www.loadbang.net

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by Jesse

Pretty neat...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Combs 
  To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:30 PM
  Subject: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this


  Hobnox

  http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html

  -Jim



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by Softroom

Nick Rothwell wrote:

> The problem with hardware is that it can be high-maintenance.
> 
> Possibly true of Ms. Jolie as well, for all I know.
> 

I doubt marriage was uppermost in Colin's mind though.

-- 
Paul
---
http://www.SmokyFrog.com
http://www.JointIntelligenceCommittee.com

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by dave@RenegadeRhythms.com

On Tue, November 18, 2008 5:30 am, acidmitch wrote:
>

>> Hobnox
>>
>>
>> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html
>>
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>
> All I get is a blank screen. What is it supposed to be ?
>
>
>


303's and 909's and 808's...


http://www.hobnox.com/audiotool.1046.en.html

RE: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by dave@RenegadeRhythms.com

On Tue, November 18, 2008 4:32 am, Colin Fraser wrote:
>

>> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html
>>
>
> An impressive bit of coding, but given that I have most of that stuff in
> hardware form, spending any time on hobnox would be akin to playing Tomb
> Raider while Angelina Jolie was waiting for me in the bedroom.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Colin


But there is always a time and place that you can't play with Angelina
Jolie...


I'm a hardware guy.. but when I'm at the Car dealership waiting for the
car to come out of repair, then their complimentary computer in their
waiting room, becomes a place to make some nice tunes...  or when visiting
the parents...

Though I have always wanted a Suitcase Studio(something like Evolver,
MoPHo, Blofeld , MPC 1000 & P3 w/ 12 channel mixing board)... it'll be
while until I put something like that together, so this works fine until
then...


Dave

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-18 by dave@RenegadeRhythms.com

On Tue, November 18, 2008 3:24 am, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2008, at 01:30, Jim Combs wrote:
>
>
>> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html
>>
>
> If this is actually doing what it seems to be doing, I'm very
> impressed...
>
> (What next: a P3 sequencer in my web browser?)
>
No Virtual P3 that I'm aware of , but the Midibox people are working
on putting up a Virtual Midibox Seq V4....
http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_seq_virtual.html


Cheeers,
Dave

Re: Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-19 by Sylvain Delisle

I always felt that the universe is missing something like a "software 
only" P3 that would integrate with a controller like the BCR2000.  
The BCR2000 just begs to be a step sequencer controller.  It's lying 
there waiting for the perfect software.  

And then there's the P3 that is one of the greatest sequencer on 
Earth but that is expensive to built, mostly because it's built with 
a decicated controller.

Food for thoughts?  Ok, that won't give us a CV sequencer, but the P3 
wasn't either.

Sylvain


--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, dave@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> On Tue, November 18, 2008 3:24 am, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> > On 18 Nov 2008, at 01:30, Jim Combs wrote:
> >
> >
> >> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html
> >>
> >
> > If this is actually doing what it seems to be doing, I'm very
> > impressed...
> >
> > (What next: a P3 sequencer in my web browser?)
> >
> No Virtual P3 that I'm aware of , but the Midibox people are working
> on putting up a Virtual Midibox Seq V4....
> http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_seq_virtual.html
> 
> 
> Cheeers,
> Dave
>

Re: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Colin, thought you might like this

2008-11-19 by henry stamerjohann

Overall Timing of a Software step sequencer would be horrible.
Only programmed specialized hardware can hold up with a good
Timing/groove. Technically the current Linux / osx / windows OS have
A bad realtime sheduling and ext. USB controllers won't work accurate
enough in comparison to hardware like P3, SAM-16, MAQ16/3, or  
grooveboxes like MPC, etc.


On 19.11.2008, at 04:33, "Sylvain Delisle" <sdelisle@sympatico.ca>  
wrote:

> I always felt that the universe is missing something like a "software
> only" P3 that would integrate with a controller like the BCR2000.
> The BCR2000 just begs to be a step sequencer controller. It's lying
> there waiting for the perfect software.
>
> And then there's the P3 that is one of the greatest sequencer on
> Earth but that is expensive to built, mostly because it's built with
> a decicated controller.
>
> Food for thoughts? Ok, that won't give us a CV sequencer, but the P3
> wasn't either.
>
> Sylvain
>
> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, dave@... wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, November 18, 2008 3:24 am, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> > > On 18 Nov 2008, at 01:30, Jim Combs wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> http://www.hobnox.com/index.1056.de.html
> > >>
> > >
> > > If this is actually doing what it seems to be doing, I'm very
> > > impressed...
> > >
> > > (What next: a P3 sequencer in my web browser?)
> > >
> > No Virtual P3 that I'm aware of , but the Midibox people are working
> > on putting up a Virtual Midibox Seq V4....
> > http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_seq_virtual.html
> >
> >
> > Cheeers,
> > Dave
> >
>
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.