> Yes, it's perfectly correct - but personally I find the use of the term > 'blown away' condescending. It's like a nursery tale - as if we need > it > explained that way to grok it. And the bit about 'discovering Quantum > Mechanics in the process' - OK fine, but please. True, but you've taken it out of context. That was part 1 of a series in Sound On Sound that already runs to 58 parts. The first part or chapter of any significant work tends to be a bit lighthearted in order to get readers comfortable with the subject matter. Now, tell me truly whether you fully understood the maths outlining the Bessel Functions in parts 12 and 13, or how S&H leads to A/D and D/A converters in parts 16 and 17, or the theory of Pulse Width Modulation in part 46, or... Well, you get my drift. If you want hard facts, they're all there, too. And if you would like to discuss Quantum Mechanics or Cosmology, we can do that as well. Regards, Gordon (formerly, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge.)
Message
Re: [analogue_systems] Re: modular synthesizer literature
2003-12-16 by Gordon Reid
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.