I think Bob limited it to this number of sockets to assure there wouldn't be any current issues with multiple modules equipped with displays, which eat up a ton of juice through no fault of A. Systems! wrote: > > hello peter, > > yes, i agree with you in the most points. > what i was trying to say is that it is not ok > to have only 10 connectors in a frame as big as the rs15. > it would be ok if the dual or triple cables were free, > just like the standard power cables, but it doesn't look > like that. i can't think of a system with only 10 modules > in a rs15 frame, so you don't have a clue, you have to use > those special cables. i don't care about the money, it is > more a question of principle. maybe i'm just too german? > > another thing, the dip sockets are cheap, yes. but there > are other sockets and connectors available which are > much more rigid and they are not much more expensive. > from my point of view it doesn't make sense to save money on > the connectors. would anybody care if the modules would cost > 1 pound more than they do? probably not, but it bothers > me when i have to pay 20 euro for a cable with cheap dip sockets, > just to be able to connect another module. > > anyway, yesterday i felt really pissed about that, today > i feel much more relaxed. if i have to pay for the cables, > then this will be ok, but i don't think that this will make > me a happy customer. > > best wishes > > ingo > > > > --- In analogue_systems@yahoogroups.com, Peter Grenader <peter@b...> > wrote: >> Bob really raised the pole for everyone with the new PSU. Its much > better >> mechanically and electrically, but let me just comment briefly on > the socket >> selection. >> >> While some of this is my own conclusion, I think it's fair to say > that >> Analogue Systems, by virtue of coming after Doepfer, was conforming > to the >> Doepfer standards for power requirements, size, jack type, etc. > This was a >> supremely intuitive decision on Bob's part as it created a cross > platform >> which has unquestionably helped his sales. A brilliant move. >> >> But - for obvious reasons, he wanted to avoid using other companies > PSUs if >> at all possible. It only makes sense. You can easily guarantee a > product's >> performance if you can control it's operation. Once a second party > product >> is introduced, you then lose a certain amount of control and > therefore, you >> can no longer unquestionably guarantee the operation. I'm not > speaking >> about the user side of the faceplate here, that's 200% compatible - > I'm >> speaking about it's supply voltage source. I am also not dissing > the >> Doepfer PSU. It's a fine unit, it's just not made by Analogue > Systems and >> from a manufacturers standpoint, more of a risk. The very same > holds true >> with Doepfer modules powered by A. Sys supplies. It will work > fine - but >> it's not a controlled situation, that's all. >> >> So how to you design in exclusivity? You use another connector > scheme and >> that's what Bob did. Analogue Solutions was willing to take that > risk and >> their modules have accommodations for both the Doepfer inline and > the A. >> Sys's DIP connections. >> >> Bob's decision to go with DIP connectors make sense as they are a > cost >> effective functional alternative to the Doepfer scheme. You just > have to be >> careful when connecting them, that's all. Listen, I've got hands > as large >> as cricket mallets. It takes a bit of getting used to, but you do > and it >> gets easy at that point. One thing I've noticed that really makes >> connections easier is if you remove either the top or bottom panel > from the >> rack when making multiple connections (like when setting up your > system >> initially), because it allows you to view things from a shallower > angle so >> you're not covering up the area you need to see with your hand. >> >> With Bob's new power distribution panel things are much better off > because >> he included Doepfer style terminations along with his DIP sockets > on his new >> motherboard. He also fused the secondary side of the syste (not > just the >> AC mains, but the DC voltsges as well) so even if ther is a > problem, the >> chance of it doing little more than blowing a fuse is distant. >> >> just my conjecture here... >> >> - P > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
Re: [analogue_systems] Re: old rs15 is not well designed
2004-09-01 by Peter Grenader
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.