Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue systems

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Message

Re: RS95 v Blacet oscilators

2003-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)

--- In analogue_systems@yahoogroups.com, Tentochi 
<tentochi2003@y...> wrote:
> > John's osc's have a huge range - they go slower than
> > both my Analog Systems,
> > CEM, MOTM and Doepfer LFO's and up to about 14,000
> > cycles!
> 
Shit  - once every 2 1/2 hours?  this is slow and I stand corrected.  
My only experience with MOTM LFOs is the one in his truple 
resonant filter, the only MOTM i own.
> 
> Additionally, the MOTM-300 VCO's top rate is in excess
> of 38 kHz.  Its slowest rate (although not as slow as
> the Blacet VCO--but this is necessary since Blacet
> does not currently have a dedicated LFO in its
> line-up) is one cycle every 5 seconds.  

Nice -And I think the MOTM has both a soft and hard sync, yes?   
That's a another great feature.  but I prefer the functionality of the 
Blacet sounder.  Ait's the expo FM in is great for those 
oh-so-close-to-subotnick sounds. I also forgot to mention John 
has a dedicated jack which will raise (or lower) the pitch exactly 
one octave if a + voltage is applied, and down one if a negative is 
applied.  I don't use it much as I am not  into synthesis as a 
keyboardist, but for those who are this is very useful.

nighty night,

Peter
> 
> 
__________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.