--- In analogue_systems@yahoogroups.com, Tentochi <tentochi2003@y...> wrote: > > John's osc's have a huge range - they go slower than > > both my Analog Systems, > > CEM, MOTM and Doepfer LFO's and up to about 14,000 > > cycles! > Shit - once every 2 1/2 hours? this is slow and I stand corrected. My only experience with MOTM LFOs is the one in his truple resonant filter, the only MOTM i own. > > Additionally, the MOTM-300 VCO's top rate is in excess > of 38 kHz. Its slowest rate (although not as slow as > the Blacet VCO--but this is necessary since Blacet > does not currently have a dedicated LFO in its > line-up) is one cycle every 5 seconds. Nice -And I think the MOTM has both a soft and hard sync, yes? That's a another great feature. but I prefer the functionality of the Blacet sounder. Ait's the expo FM in is great for those oh-so-close-to-subotnick sounds. I also forgot to mention John has a dedicated jack which will raise (or lower) the pitch exactly one octave if a + voltage is applied, and down one if a negative is applied. I don't use it much as I am not into synthesis as a keyboardist, but for those who are this is very useful. nighty night, Peter > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: RS95 v Blacet oscilators
2003-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.