--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, "koifish3543" <koifish3543@...> wrote: > > Hi. New member here, so please forgive me if this issue has come up before. I wasn't able to find it by searching the forum. > > I have a Sequential Circuits Six-Trak that I've created a template for using BC Manager. It's awesome, but I have one annoyance that I can't seem to find a work around for. > > Most of the channels on the Six-Trak are calibrated to something other than 0-127. (For example, the filter attack amount has 16 steps from 0-15.) So when programming the Six-Trak locally the user enters in a value from 0-15, but when controlling it remotely the user sends values from 0-127 which the Six-Trak interprets as 0-15. Make sense? > > What I would like to do is have the BCR *display* a count from 0-15 while *sending* a value from 0-127. This puts the numeric display in familiar territory for the user and should lower the precision of the knobs to the synth's limitations. > > Thanks. > Okay, I did some homework and this appears to be control resolution issue (i.e., different controls have different operating resolutions). The Fine Tune control is a 5-bit control and a switch is a 1-bit control, etc. I had hoped that if I switched over to sending sysex messages instead of cc messages, I could set the number of bits in the control and thus bring the BCR and the Six-Trak into the same numeric realm. But that doesn't seem to be working. For one thing, I'm not clear on what "Value" setting in BC Manage correlates to what bit resolution. The value settings are listed as Value, Value: bits 0-6, Value: bit 0, etc. I tried them all and none allowed me to synchronize the numbers. Any suggestions? I would think this would be a common issue. Thanks.
Message
Re: Calibrating BCR CC display versus the send value
2009-07-12 by koifish3543
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.