Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000) group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000)

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Message

Re: [bc2000] Re: -- encoders type ? --

2012-04-02 by Tero Mäyränen

Thanks, that's me, joined the group!

Yeah, 24 vs. 96 could be bad... Could be usable, if you use it for a
parameter that only needs small adjustments? :-)

Anyway, I thought all encoders worked the same way, but from the links
here it seems that's not the case.

--
tero

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Martin Ator <cyllall@...> wrote:
> Hello,
>          Yes it should work, but you would have to turn the encoder 5 or 6 times with a more common 24 pulse per revolution encoder, or change the resolution of the software?
>
> There is many a Tero in Finland. Do you have a Roland CMU-800?
>
> I built the Apple II interface for mine. The C64 was too complicated for my small brain but I may try again soon. My knowledge of logic is slowly improving. If it was you who originally tried to help me, then thanks.
> There's a CMU Yahoo group if you want to search for it.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.