Thanks, that's me, joined the group! Yeah, 24 vs. 96 could be bad... Could be usable, if you use it for a parameter that only needs small adjustments? :-) Anyway, I thought all encoders worked the same way, but from the links here it seems that's not the case. -- tero On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Martin Ator <cyllall@...> wrote: > Hello, > Yes it should work, but you would have to turn the encoder 5 or 6 times with a more common 24 pulse per revolution encoder, or change the resolution of the software? > > There is many a Tero in Finland. Do you have a Roland CMU-800? > > I built the Apple II interface for mine. The C64 was too complicated for my small brain but I may try again soon. My knowledge of logic is slowly improving. If it was you who originally tried to help me, then thanks. > There's a CMU Yahoo group if you want to search for it.
Message
Re: [bc2000] Re: -- encoders type ? --
2012-04-02 by Tero Mäyränen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.