Cgs synth

I still am unsure of the complete function of mine. The bandwidth
control needs to be at least 3/4 open to hear the incoming signal
when tracking the v/oct CV. I can hear the deeply filtered input
when the damping is way up. Maybe I'm expecting too much "filter-
like" quality?

I set up the VCO core just like the CGS VCO. The Bi-N-Tic tracks
very well. The FM input provides a good deal of fun, but a "normal"
sweep with an EG plugged into the v/oct is not realy happening for
me. It's more like sweeping a VCO - with lots of modulation.

I guess I need to play more. It is fun to play with the Bi-N-Tic as
the results are not what you'd think you should get.

Chub

--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@e...>
wrote:

> Glad to hear my suggestion was helpful. I just got in all my Bi-N-

Tic

> parts, but haven't assembled it yet. My module will use the

Stooge

> panel that Dave Brown came up with. Since Larry Hendry hasn't

started

> taking orders for the panels yet, I'll have to wait a while. In

the

> mean time I will build the PC board and test it. I know it will

be

> great, because when my wife heard one of the Bi-N-Tic samples, she

said,

> "Please don't get that module!" Thanks again, Ken, for reading

old

> Electronotes and making PC boards.
>
> -Richard Brewster
>
> charlesosthelder wrote:
>
> >No muss, no fuss - just one wrong part - and more cool noise than

any

> >one device should be able to make! I still have to tweak my

setup, but

> >this baby is GREAT!
> >
> >I used the Brewster sub mod, but without the switch. Instead,

the

> >panel has four sub outs, two inputs with attenuation, an

attenuable FM

> >input, sync and V/oct ins. I left out the switch and use a patch

cord

> >instead to keep things cleaner.
> >
> >The setup seems a bit different from the VCO. Does anyone have

any

> >thoughts about the setup? I just went for maximum range for now.
> >
> >One again, thanks Ken!
> >
> >Chub
> >
> >
> >