>Does this mean that all 3 1uF electrolytics that are first encounteredCorrect. (except for the HP input, where a link is installed instead)
>after the LP, HP and BP inputs should be put in 'backwards' on the
>pcb, that is, the negative of the electrolytic placed at the + on the
>pcb?
>> Nyle also suggests leaving out the 1uF electro (use a link instead)Remove the 390k resistor. It should not change the characteristics.
>> and pulldown resistor (leave empty) on the High Pass input.
>So remove the first 1uF after the HP input. Do I remove the 390K or
>remove the 1K (next to the 2n2 capacitor)? Does this change the
>timbre characteristics of the HP?
>> If you look at the circuit, there is a 1kThe 2n2 and 1k are part of the filter. The should be left as is. The parts I
>> "pulldown" and a 2n2 "decoupler" present as parts of the filter
>core. No
>> harm will come if these parts are left in.
>Is this a separate issue to removing the 1uF electrolytic in the HP
>input mentioned immediately above? Does retaining the 2n2 and
>associated 1K change the timbre characteristics of the HP?
was refering to as not being critical if removed or left are the 1uf and the
390k, so with respect to the HP input you have the two options here:
1) reverse the 1uF into the HP input, and change nothing else.
or
2) remove the 390k and 1uF from the HP input, and put a link in place of the
1uF.
Cheers,
Ken
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>