I intend to put up a second demo of the Bi-N-Tic used as a filter.
I used Q4-Q7, buffered by a CGS-56 board, for the SUB 1-4 outputs.
Panel composition is always an exercise in trade-offs. I have plenty of
mixer/attenuators, such as the Oakley Multi-mix, which really are useful
to accommodate non-attenuated inputs. I'm considering adding some
passive attenuator pots, too.
Richard Brewster
Mark wrote:
I used Q4-Q7, buffered by a CGS-56 board, for the SUB 1-4 outputs.
Panel composition is always an exercise in trade-offs. I have plenty of
mixer/attenuators, such as the Oakley Multi-mix, which really are useful
to accommodate non-attenuated inputs. I'm considering adding some
passive attenuator pots, too.
Richard Brewster
Mark wrote:
> On 4/14/07, Richard Brewster put forth:
>
>> As I mentioned last week, I patched up a demo of the Bi-N-Tic Filter to
>> show how it can work nicely as a VCO. Go here to listen to it.
>>
>> http://www.pugix.com/bottom-cabinet-lower.htm#cgsbintic
>>
>> bi-n-tic-vcf-vco.mp3 <http://www.pugix.com/music/bi-n-tic-vcf-vco.mp3>
>>
>
> Thank you for posting that. I would love to hear more demos of the
> bintic being used as a filter -- especially with complex sounds such
> as voice and instrument samples.
>
> I noticed that your version is different from the Bridechamber
> version, and does not have an input level knob for the filter.
> That's one thing that annoys the hell out of me with the MOTM-490.
> Anyway, it does illustrate that many different configurations are
> possible. Which outputs from the counter did you choose for sub 1 -
> 4?? I'd like to hear about what other UI choices people have made.
>
>