Substituting an electrolyte for a non-electrolyte can generally be
considered safe, if you're really sure it's the right value.
But substituting it with your 0.47 _p_F ceramic probably won't work as expected.
considered safe, if you're really sure it's the right value.
But substituting it with your 0.47 _p_F ceramic probably won't work as expected.
On 5/18/07, Andrew <dumpstatic@...> wrote:
> Oops, yeah that's the one I mean. Don't have it in front of me here
> at work :)
>
> I have the right number of F's, but the wrong type. Is there any
> chance that the ceramic will work or do I need to go shopping?
>
> thanks for any thoughts!
> Andrew
>
> --- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, Louis van Dompselaar <louis@...>
>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure where you see a 47pF cap. There is a 0.47uF
> eletrolitic in
> > there though (470nF).
> >
> > > The only 47pF cap I have is a ceramic (non-polarized). On the
> Digital
> > > Noise PCB, the labeling clearly shows a polarized Electrolitic
> > > capacitor in that spot.
> > >
> > > Will the ceramic one work, or am I just asking for trouble by
> using
> > > it...?
> > >
> >
>
>
>
--
Love. /Bruce Harris
--
-----BEGIN 2ROT13 MESSAGE-----
Low Bitrate Netlabel: <http://f-label.tojt.net/>
Electronic music forum:
<http://oxo-unlimited.com/forums>
Sätt på ett par flipflops, vippa på rumpan
och gör det här till en minnesvärd sommar!
-----END 2ROT13 MESSAGE-----