Thanks Richard
I'm working on the CGS58 that is in the Best of CGS 'BOG' panel. Serge/CGS is my favourite format and what i do all of my live shows on.
It's funny but i find myself wanting to make this LFO uber slow like the envelopes on the DUSG which is right next to it in the same panel.
________________________________
From: Richarius Molindarius <richmolindarius@...>
To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [cgs_synth] CGS 58 - Utility LFO minimum rate mod
For the integrator cap. as well keep in mind, if I'm not mistaken, you
can't go with a polarized cap, like an electrolytic; tantalum; etc. Try
going up to a 0.47.
Also - in NON-waveform changing LFOs, I had always used at least a 1 meg
size for the speed pot. That helps to give a much wider range though,
lesser resolution for speeds.
I remember when I had built my first variable waveform LFO back in the 90's
that my larger pot size for speed, did cause interaction with the waveshape
of the waveshape changing pot. Your milage may vary.
I myself have recently given up on LFOs and VCLFOs specifically moving
completely to Serge modules instead. Far more power. Look at those that
Ken has available. Tons and tons of modulation power that in my opinion,
blows away the functionality of LFOs/VCLFOs. :)
--
Take care,
Warmth and Peace,
Rich
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'm working on the CGS58 that is in the Best of CGS 'BOG' panel. Serge/CGS is my favourite format and what i do all of my live shows on.
It's funny but i find myself wanting to make this LFO uber slow like the envelopes on the DUSG which is right next to it in the same panel.
________________________________
From: Richarius Molindarius <richmolindarius@...>
To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [cgs_synth] CGS 58 - Utility LFO minimum rate mod
For the integrator cap. as well keep in mind, if I'm not mistaken, you
can't go with a polarized cap, like an electrolytic; tantalum; etc. Try
going up to a 0.47.
Also - in NON-waveform changing LFOs, I had always used at least a 1 meg
size for the speed pot. That helps to give a much wider range though,
lesser resolution for speeds.
I remember when I had built my first variable waveform LFO back in the 90's
that my larger pot size for speed, did cause interaction with the waveshape
of the waveshape changing pot. Your milage may vary.
I myself have recently given up on LFOs and VCLFOs specifically moving
completely to Serge modules instead. Far more power. Look at those that
Ken has available. Tons and tons of modulation power that in my opinion,
blows away the functionality of LFOs/VCLFOs. :)
--
Take care,
Warmth and Peace,
Rich
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]