Thoughts:
You could make some "switched attenuators" instead of using pots - basically
dual gang rotary switches with 1% resistors between each step. That of
course gets very expensive.
You could buy a few pots and test them, and see how bad they really are.
Maybe you can pic the best.
Maybe it would be better if each channel could be adjusted individually anyway.
Ken
dreaming ?
Ken Stone sasami@... otherunicorn@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.cgs.synth.net/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>
You could make some "switched attenuators" instead of using pots - basically
dual gang rotary switches with 1% resistors between each step. That of
course gets very expensive.
You could buy a few pots and test them, and see how bad they really are.
Maybe you can pic the best.
Maybe it would be better if each channel could be adjusted individually anyway.
Ken
>Hey guys, I would like to build a stereo version of the res. eq.my mixer through.
>The idea would be to build a desktop box that i can run my master bus from
>getting close to the same response from both boards ?
>I was wondering if anyone could offer any practical advice as far as
>tolerances between the 2 sections can be 10-20 % different.
>At first thought i was going to use dual gang pots but then have read the
>Do you guys know of any other affordable solutions ?the pots i figured this should be doable for a reasonable cost but maybe i'm
>
>I assumed to match all the caps in the filter sections.Other than that and
dreaming ?
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Thanks for any insight you guys can share.
>
>-Tony
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>The CGS Modular Synth home page: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Ken Stone sasami@... otherunicorn@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.cgs.synth.net/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>