Individual control over left and right may be the most economical way to go but i think i will order a hand full and do as you suggest to see just how off they are.
Thanks Ken, all food for thought.
Thanks Ken, all food for thought.
--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, sasami@... wrote:
>
> Thoughts:
>
> You could make some "switched attenuators" instead of using pots - basically
> dual gang rotary switches with 1% resistors between each step. That of
> course gets very expensive.
>
> You could buy a few pots and test them, and see how bad they really are.
> Maybe you can pic the best.
>
> Maybe it would be better if each channel could be adjusted individually anyway.
>
> Ken
>
> >Hey guys, I would like to build a stereo version of the res. eq.
> >The idea would be to build a desktop box that i can run my master bus from
> my mixer through.
> >
> >I was wondering if anyone could offer any practical advice as far as
> getting close to the same response from both boards ?
> >
> >At first thought i was going to use dual gang pots but then have read the
> tolerances between the 2 sections can be 10-20 % different.
> >Do you guys know of any other affordable solutions ?
> >
> >I assumed to match all the caps in the filter sections.Other than that and
> the pots i figured this should be doable for a reasonable cost but maybe i'm
> dreaming ?
> >
> >Thanks for any insight you guys can share.
> >
> >-Tony
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >The CGS Modular Synth home page: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Ken Stone sasami@... otherunicorn@...
> Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.cgs.synth.net/>
> Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>
>