Krimo wrote:
boards. The Steiner VCF board is narrow, so you even have room to mount
two of them side by side on one bracket. The only boards I mount by pot
brackets are Oakleys that are specifically designed for this type of
mounting.
that it is better to have a fixed output level. Attenuation should
occur on inputs. Save a panel pot and put in a fixed resistor.
-Richard Brewster
>Hi All,I use a Stooge 3-pot short bracket, which is long enough for Ken's PC
>
>New to this group, live in Holland and working on MOTM/Oakley/CGS
>system.
>
>Got a Steiner VCF PCB coming my way and got two questions (cross posting
>to SynthPanels group):
>
>1. What are my best options for mounting it on a Schaeffer panel, I
>figure there's more than one way (Stooge bracks/pot bracks?) can someone
>maybe make a breakdown of the best/less good/worst options?
>
>
boards. The Steiner VCF board is narrow, so you even have room to mount
two of them side by side on one bracket. The only boards I mount by pot
brackets are Oakleys that are specifically designed for this type of
mounting.
>I second John Loffink's suggestion here:
>2. Concerning the gain stage, is it advisable to ad an overall gain pot
>or will a resistor/link do? I like tsomneevich design in the SynthPanels
>files section, would this be a matter of adding an extra hole, under the
>hp in for example?
>
>
>
>Output "level" jumper/resistor: I put 180K in the level position, inWhile many CGS modules provide for a variable output level, my view is
>addition to the 47K already in the op amp feedback path, or just put 220K
>total in the 47K position. This gave the maximum resonant oscillation
>amplitude without clipping and brought the normal non-oscillating output to
>a better level.
>
>
>
>
that it is better to have a fixed output level. Attenuation should
occur on inputs. Save a panel pot and put in a fixed resistor.
-Richard Brewster