Yahoo Groups archive

Cgs synth

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Thread

Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

2005-05-08 by djbrow54

I really liked Richard's design for the CGS Bi-N-Tic
filter with the sub outputs. I also like all the tic
marks and this makes for a fairly expensive panel. We've
collaborated and come up with a common design that we will
submit as a Stooge panel for Larry's next panel run. This
will make the cost very reasonable.

I've uploaded a .jpg of it to the files section:
"Brewster-Brown_Bi-N-Tic.jpg"

Dave

Re: Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

2005-05-08 by Adam Schabtach

Maybe it's just because I haven't had my tea yet this morning, but I'm
confused as to why there is a SUB IN pot but no corresponding jack. When I
saw the four-position switch markings I assumed you intended to run what Ken
calls the IN 2 signal through the NC connection of a jack (rather than one
position of a five-position switch), but I couldn't find that jack...

--Adam

Re: Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

2005-05-08 by djbrow54

The sub outputs are buffered +/- 5 volt levels from the counter
that muxes the switched capacitors. They are the sub outputs
of the internal VCO. The switch selects 1 of four outputs and
and the sub in adjusts the level as the second input to the
mixer.

A normalized sub in jack would simply be a second input
to the filter. It seems like there is more advantage in using
the panel space for FM inputs since an audio mixer could be
used prior to the input jack for additional inputs.

Dave
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, "Adam Schabtach" <adam@s...> wrote:
> Maybe it's just because I haven't had my tea yet this morning, but
I'm
> confused as to why there is a SUB IN pot but no corresponding jack.
When I
> saw the four-position switch markings I assumed you intended to run
what Ken
> calls the IN 2 signal through the NC connection of a jack (rather
than one
> position of a five-position switch), but I couldn't find that jack..
.
>
> --Adam

Re: Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

2005-05-09 by data2action

Dave,

Looks great, I'd order one. A couple of minor suggestions:

--Swap FM and Sub (select switch) controls (so their proximity
matches their related function, as w/ the coures/fine controls)
--Likewise, swap the FM and Synch In inputs...

Might this make it in time for the next run of stoogepanels?

bbob
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@e...> wrote:
> I really liked Richard's design for the CGS Bi-N-Tic
> filter with the sub outputs. I also like all the tic
> marks and this makes for a fairly expensive panel. We've
> collaborated and come up with a common design that we will
> submit as a Stooge panel for Larry's next panel run. This
> will make the cost very reasonable.
>
> I've uploaded a .jpg of it to the files section:
> "Brewster-Brown_Bi-N-Tic.jpg"
>
> Dave

Re: Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

2005-05-09 by Larry Hendry

As slow as I am you can count on it.
Larry

data2action <rdrake@...> wrote:
Might this make it in time for the next run of stoogepanels?



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Stooge panel design for Bi-N-Tic filter

2005-05-12 by djbrow54

We've taken feedback and rev'd the Bi-N-Tic filter for the
next stooge panel run. I've replaced it in the files section
with a (RevB).

Comments?

Dave
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@e...> wrote:
> I really liked Richard's design for the CGS Bi-N-Tic
> filter with the sub outputs. I also like all the tic
> marks and this makes for a fairly expensive panel. We've
> collaborated and come up with a common design that we will
> submit as a Stooge panel for Larry's next panel run. This
> will make the cost very reasonable.
>
> I've uploaded a .jpg of it to the files section:
> "Brewster-Brown_Bi-N-Tic.jpg"
>
> Dave

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.