Yahoo Groups archive

Cgs synth

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Thread

Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-22 by Richard Brewster

I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even says,
"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right type of
capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion on
Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be anywhere
from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from the 4052
outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second question is
what values have folks used here and did they need to add resistors?
Details appreciated.

Thanks,

-Richard Brewster

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-22 by Larry Hendry

The stardard recommended cap is the 47nF IIRC. I used that one, and
the stock op amp and I am less than satisfied with the droop. I plan
to change the S&H op amp to a FET input amp TL071 and probably change
the cap to a 100n. So, I think this you list below may be a good
choice.
Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text

--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
> 505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even
> says,
> "suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right
> type of
> capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion
> on
> Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be
> anywhere
> from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from the
> 4052
> outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second question
> is
> what values have folks used here and did they need to add
> resistors?
> Details appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Richard Brewster
>
>
>
>
> See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
> Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
> Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-22 by sasami@hotkey.net.au

These Wimas sound just right for the job. IF you are going to "huge" caps
like 470n, perhaps put a 33 ohm resistor in series to take stress of the
CMOS chip.

Ken
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
>505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even says,
>"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right type of
>capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion on
>Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be anywhere
>from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from the 4052
>outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second question is
>what values have folks used here and did they need to add resistors?
>Details appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Richard Brewster
>
>
>
>
>See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
>Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@... or sasami@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-22 by Richard Brewster

Hi Larry,

Yes, I want to use the 100n to lessen the droop. Isn't the LF356 better
here than a TL071? I am looking at the LF356 data sheet, and one of the
features is extremely fast settling time. Must be a reason Ken picked it
over the TL071. I socket all my CGS boards, because they are
experimental, so I can play around with different chips.

-Richard

Larry Hendry wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>The stardard recommended cap is the 47nF IIRC. I used that one, and
>the stock op amp and I am less than satisfied with the droop. I plan
>to change the S&H op amp to a FET input amp TL071 and probably change
>the cap to a 100n. So, I think this you list below may be a good
>choice.
>Larry
>
>--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>
>
>>I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
>>505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even
>>says,
>>"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right
>>type of
>>capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion
>>on
>>Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be
>>anywhere
>>from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from the
>>4052
>>outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second question
>>is
>>what values have folks used here and did they need to add
>>resistors?
>>Details appreciated.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>-Richard Brewster
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
>>Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>>Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year
>http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer
>
>
>
>See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
>Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-23 by Larry Hendry

Well, I plan to leave the original 2 I built stock. I am building 2
more. I think I'll use the cap you have listed below (thanks). Like
you, on this one I intend to socket the chips so I can compare. Once
I know what I want, I'll go back and change the originals.

Now, here is another question. I plan to add internal clocks for my
2nd dual ASR. I see no reason in many cases to tie up an external
osc or clock for the job. I do intend to normal that to the jacks so
I can still jack in an external clock.

I am trying to decide what I think the useful range of the internal
clock shoudl be. I want to scale the clock frequency control to only
include the useful range. Since I am not an experianced ASR user,
any input would be apprecited.

Larry

Show quoted textHide quoted text

--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> Yes, I want to use the 100n to lessen the droop. Isn't the LF356
> better
> here than a TL071? I am looking at the LF356 data sheet, and one of
> the
> features is extremely fast settling time. Must be a reason Ken
> picked it
> over the TL071. I socket all my CGS boards, because they are
> experimental, so I can play around with different chips.
>
> -Richard
>
> Larry Hendry wrote:
>
> >The stardard recommended cap is the 47nF IIRC. I used that one,
> and
> >the stock op amp and I am less than satisfied with the droop. I
> plan
> >to change the S&H op amp to a FET input amp TL071 and probably
> change
> >the cap to a 100n. So, I think this you list below may be a good
> >choice.
> >Larry
> >
> >--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
> >>505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even
> >>says,
> >>"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right
> >>type of
> >>capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion
> >>on
> >>Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be
> >>anywhere
> >>from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from
> the
> >>4052
> >>outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second
> question
> >>is
> >>what values have folks used here and did they need to add
> >>resistors?
> >>Details appreciated.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>-Richard Brewster
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
> >>Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
> >>Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year
> >http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer
> >
> >
> >
> >See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
> >Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
> >Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
> Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
> Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-23 by John Loffink

Instead of the LF356s on the ASR I used CA3140AEs. Most important
parameters for a S&H buffer op amp are settling time and input bias current.
The LF356 has better settling time but as the switch remains open for the
entire clock cycle this parameter is not important in this circuit. For
typical slow rates as note shift registers the op amp input bias current is
the most important factor along with switch (4052) and capacitor leakage.
TL071 will be worse in the application than the LF356. Other factors are
board layout and parasitic capacitance from use of IC sockets. I do not
recommend sockets in this application, though I can't quantify the
contribution to the droop.

I used 47N caps, Mouser part number 1429-2473. Droop did not seem to be
significant, but I must admit I did not measure this.

Op Amp Parameters
Chip settling time input bias input offset
To 0.01% current (pA) current (pA)
Typ max typ max
LF356 1.5 us 30 200 3 50
TL071 ??? 65 200 5 100
CA3140AE 4.5 us 10 40 0.5 20

For a built in clock I recommend rates typical for note or arpeggio
generation, roughly 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz.

John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Hendry [mailto:hendrysr@...]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:08 PM
> To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cgs_synth] Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift
> Register
>
> Well, I plan to leave the original 2 I built stock. I am building 2
> more. I think I'll use the cap you have listed below (thanks). Like
> you, on this one I intend to socket the chips so I can compare. Once
> I know what I want, I'll go back and change the originals.
>
> Now, here is another question. I plan to add internal clocks for my
> 2nd dual ASR. I see no reason in many cases to tie up an external
> osc or clock for the job. I do intend to normal that to the jacks so
> I can still jack in an external clock.
>
> I am trying to decide what I think the useful range of the internal
> clock shoudl be. I want to scale the clock frequency control to only
> include the useful range. Since I am not an experianced ASR user,
> any input would be apprecited.
>
> Larry
>
>
> --- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> > Hi Larry,
> >
> > Yes, I want to use the 100n to lessen the droop. Isn't the LF356
> > better
> > here than a TL071? I am looking at the LF356 data sheet, and one of
> > the
> > features is extremely fast settling time. Must be a reason Ken
> > picked it
> > over the TL071. I socket all my CGS boards, because they are
> > experimental, so I can play around with different chips.
> >
> > -Richard
> >
> > Larry Hendry wrote:
> >
> > >The stardard recommended cap is the 47nF IIRC. I used that one,
> > and
> > >the stock op amp and I am less than satisfied with the droop. I
> > plan
> > >to change the S&H op amp to a FET input amp TL071 and probably
> > change
> > >the cap to a 100n. So, I think this you list below may be a good
> > >choice.
> > >Larry
> > >
> > >--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
> > >>505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even
> > >>says,
> > >>"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right
> > >>type of
> > >>capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion
> > >>on
> > >>Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be
> > >>anywhere
> > >>from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from
> > the
> > >>4052
> > >>outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second
> > question
> > >>is
> > >>what values have folks used here and did they need to add
> > >>resistors?
> > >>Details appreciated.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks,
> > >>
> > >>-Richard Brewster
> > >>
> > >>

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-23 by Richard Brewster

Thanks for the information, John. I will use CA3140AE chips and solder
them in. I am still going with the 100n WIMA cap.

-Richard Brewster

John Loffink wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Instead of the LF356s on the ASR I used CA3140AEs. Most important
>parameters for a S&H buffer op amp are settling time and input bias current.
>The LF356 has better settling time but as the switch remains open for the
>entire clock cycle this parameter is not important in this circuit. For
>typical slow rates as note shift registers the op amp input bias current is
>the most important factor along with switch (4052) and capacitor leakage.
>TL071 will be worse in the application than the LF356. Other factors are
>board layout and parasitic capacitance from use of IC sockets. I do not
>recommend sockets in this application, though I can't quantify the
>contribution to the droop.
>
>I used 47N caps, Mouser part number 1429-2473. Droop did not seem to be
>significant, but I must admit I did not measure this.
>
>Op Amp Parameters
>Chip settling time input bias input offset
> To 0.01% current (pA) current (pA)
> Typ max typ max
>LF356 1.5 us 30 200 3 50
>TL071 ??? 65 200 5 100
>CA3140AE 4.5 us 10 40 0.5 20
>
>For a built in clock I recommend rates typical for note or arpeggio
>generation, roughly 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz.
>
>John Loffink
>The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
>http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
>The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
>http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Larry Hendry [mailto:hendrysr@...]
>>Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:08 PM
>>To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [cgs_synth] Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift
>>Register
>>
>>Well, I plan to leave the original 2 I built stock. I am building 2
>>more. I think I'll use the cap you have listed below (thanks). Like
>>you, on this one I intend to socket the chips so I can compare. Once
>>I know what I want, I'll go back and change the originals.
>>
>>Now, here is another question. I plan to add internal clocks for my
>>2nd dual ASR. I see no reason in many cases to tie up an external
>>osc or clock for the job. I do intend to normal that to the jacks so
>>I can still jack in an external clock.
>>
>>I am trying to decide what I think the useful range of the internal
>>clock shoudl be. I want to scale the clock frequency control to only
>>include the useful range. Since I am not an experianced ASR user,
>>any input would be apprecited.
>>
>>Larry
>>
>>
>>--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Larry,
>>>
>>>Yes, I want to use the 100n to lessen the droop. Isn't the LF356
>>>better
>>>here than a TL071? I am looking at the LF356 data sheet, and one of
>>>the
>>>features is extremely fast settling time. Must be a reason Ken
>>>picked it
>>>over the TL071. I socket all my CGS boards, because they are
>>>experimental, so I can play around with different chips.
>>>
>>>-Richard
>>>
>>>Larry Hendry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The stardard recommended cap is the 47nF IIRC. I used that one,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>and
>>>
>>>
>>>>the stock op amp and I am less than satisfied with the droop. I
>>>>
>>>>
>>>plan
>>>
>>>
>>>>to change the S&H op amp to a FET input amp TL071 and probably
>>>>
>>>>
>>>change
>>>
>>>
>>>>the cap to a 100n. So, I think this you list below may be a good
>>>>choice.
>>>>Larry
>>>>
>>>>--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
>>>>>505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It even
>>>>>says,
>>>>>"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the right
>>>>>type of
>>>>>capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a discussion
>>>>>on
>>>>>Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be
>>>>>anywhere
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors from
>>>>
>>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>
>>>>>4052
>>>>>outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>question
>>>
>>>
>>>>>is
>>>>>what values have folks used here and did they need to add
>>>>>resistors?
>>>>>Details appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>-Richard Brewster
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
>Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
>Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog Shift Register

2004-05-24 by Larry Hendry

As always John, thanks for your insight.
Larry H
Show quoted textHide quoted text

--- John Loffink <jloffink@...> wrote:
> Instead of the LF356s on the ASR I used CA3140AEs. Most important
> parameters for a S&H buffer op amp are settling time and input bias
> current.
> The LF356 has better settling time but as the switch remains open
> for the
> entire clock cycle this parameter is not important in this circuit.
> For
> typical slow rates as note shift registers the op amp input bias
> current is
> the most important factor along with switch (4052) and capacitor
> leakage.
> TL071 will be worse in the application than the LF356. Other
> factors are
> board layout and parasitic capacitance from use of IC sockets. I
> do not
> recommend sockets in this application, though I can't quantify the
> contribution to the droop.
>
> I used 47N caps, Mouser part number 1429-2473. Droop did not seem
> to be
> significant, but I must admit I did not measure this.
>
> Op Amp Parameters
> Chip settling time input bias input offset
> To 0.01% current (pA) current (pA)
> Typ max typ max
> LF356 1.5 us 30 200 3 50
> TL071 ??? 65 200 5 100
> CA3140AE 4.5 us 10 40 0.5 20
>
> For a built in clock I recommend rates typical for note or arpeggio
> generation, roughly 0.1 Hz to 30 Hz.
>
> John Loffink
> The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
> http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
> The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
> http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Hendry [mailto:hendrysr@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:08 PM
> > To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [cgs_synth] Sample & Hold capacitor, CX, for Analog
> Shift
> > Register
> >
> > Well, I plan to leave the original 2 I built stock. I am
> building 2
> > more. I think I'll use the cap you have listed below (thanks).
> Like
> > you, on this one I intend to socket the chips so I can compare.
> Once
> > I know what I want, I'll go back and change the originals.
> >
> > Now, here is another question. I plan to add internal clocks for
> my
> > 2nd dual ASR. I see no reason in many cases to tie up an
> external
> > osc or clock for the job. I do intend to normal that to the
> jacks so
> > I can still jack in an external clock.
> >
> > I am trying to decide what I think the useful range of the
> internal
> > clock shoudl be. I want to scale the clock frequency control to
> only
> > include the useful range. Since I am not an experianced ASR
> user,
> > any input would be apprecited.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > --- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> > > Hi Larry,
> > >
> > > Yes, I want to use the 100n to lessen the droop. Isn't the
> LF356
> > > better
> > > here than a TL071? I am looking at the LF356 data sheet, and
> one of
> > > the
> > > features is extremely fast settling time. Must be a reason Ken
> > > picked it
> > > over the TL071. I socket all my CGS boards, because they are
> > > experimental, so I can play around with different chips.
> > >
> > > -Richard
> > >
> > > Larry Hendry wrote:
> > >
> > > >The stardard recommended cap is the 47nF IIRC. I used that
> one,
> > > and
> > > >the stock op amp and I am less than satisfied with the droop.
> I
> > > plan
> > > >to change the S&H op amp to a FET input amp TL071 and probably
> > > change
> > > >the cap to a 100n. So, I think this you list below may be a
> good
> > > >choice.
> > > >Larry
> > > >
> > > >--- Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>I'm ordering parts for the ASR. Found this mouser part:
> > > >>505-MKP20.1/250/5. WIMA metallized polypropylene film. It
> even
> > > >>says,
> > > >>"suited for sample & hold circuits." I think this is the
> right
> > > >>type of
> > > >>capacitor, yes? Now this is a 100nf part. There is a
> discussion
> > > >>on
> > > >>Ken's web page about this capacitor, which is specified to be
> > > >>anywhere
> > > >>from 47nf to 470nf. You may need to add series resistors
> from
> > > the
> > > >>4052
> > > >>outputs into these caps to protect the chip. So my second
> > > question
> > > >>is
> > > >>what values have folks used here and did they need to add
> > > >>resistors?
> > > >>Details appreciated.
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >>-Richard Brewster
> > > >>
> > > >>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
> Main: http://www.cgs.synth.net/
> Secondary: http://otherunicorn.0catch.com/synth/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.