I just found the LFO's very limiting. They run real slow then with a turn nothing seems to happen linearly. Maybe its just me, I really wanted it to be a good addition to my Korg MS bits but I found I didn't like the sound or the control. Shame really, it look ace but it took up too much room.
B
-----Original Message-----
From: staschik.schoutrop [mailto:leo.lydia@wanadoo.nl]
Sent: 27 July 2002 16:37
To: crumar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [crumar] crumar ds-2
op 26-07-2002 10:37 schreef Bennett, Paul op p.bennett@...:
?? A little rare maybe but I curtainly won't be collecting it / them..
To be honest I was very disappointed with the DS2's sound quality and range of controls.
B
you mean even a wrecked ds-2 is a collector's item?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
you mean it ? the buttons are easy to handle (big,good grip, more then sufficient space)
it's tunestable,good filter with ext.in,nice modulation"matrix" with two lfo,s and noise and besides that a polifonic electric organ section which b.e. unlike the osc's doesn't react to the portamento (special effect) .besides the keys play nice and especially for live its wonderfully to control and fat. o.k. some small things which you'll certainly have also noticed but for me ,i find it an inspiring instrument with indead some militaristic precies practical karakteristics(although i never before had that conscience association before i must say)
s
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
its true it's a bit massive also in weight.but further indeed its probably also a question of taste.nice talking by the way. maybe some day i could send some soundssamples if that's oke on this side . just to flourish this page a bit up . greetings sunny