Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Both used Adobe RGB9(1998) work space.

Your friend in Photography,

Johnny

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <ttrostel@...> wrote:
>
> --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Johnny Eades" <jeades1@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't use the C1 or ACR as printer profiling software, just to work
> > it up before sending it to Photoshop for printing. I created a
> > printer/paper/ink profile with PrintFixPro which was used as the
> > printer profile. I don't understand it either, it just worked. When I
> > worked tthe image up in Photoshop and then sent it through the
> > printer/paper/ink profile to the printer, it did not work. Yes there
> > was a definite difference on the monitor when I proofed the image in
> > Photoshop befoe sending it to the printer. The worked up image in C1
> > matched the print whereas the proof showed all the muddy tones of
> > green that was the problem I discussed with CD of Colorvision. If
> > anyone can explain why C1 worked up images would work and Photoshop
> > worked up imaged would not, feel free. I consider this a learning
> > experience.
> > 
> > Your friend in Photography,
> > 
> > Johnny Eades
> 
> So both image workflows were printed with Photoshop.  Do both images
> have the same working space?  Does one of them have no working space?  
> 
> Just curious :-)
> 
> Tom
>