Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re: [colorvision_group] So what can we expect from CV in the near future

2006-09-16 by Walt Mucha

The difference between PFP and printfix are like night and day. Continous improvements have been made to the package. David Miller and CD Tobies' dedication to helping owners of this package are unmatched in the industry IMOH. I sold my i1 package and use PFP exclusively. I ran out of my light cyan, light magenta and yellow ink and to get me by, I loaded some 2 yr old MIS archival pigs. I made a 225 patch profile with PFP Pro and the resulting prints are visually identical to my previous ones. How about 99% of the results obtained from packages costing twice as much or more than PFP. It is my understanding 2.0 is a free upgrade for 1.1 owners but don't take me at my word on that. The reason the competition is beating up on this package is they're scared stiff.

Walt


>-----Original Message-----
>From: eeprete [mailto:eeprete@...]
>Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 04:21 PM
>To: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [colorvision_group] So what can we expect from CV in the near future
>
>Truth be told, I am giving serious consideration to getting the PrintFix Pro package. I for one, 
>am impressed with David Miller's dedication to keeping in touch with the user based as 
>witnessed on the DPR forums. Even when individuals with the "better" systems try to beat up 
>on his words or CV's reputation, he stays calm and collected and true to form. That to me 
>says a great deal.
>
>I have the original PrintFix at work and I gave it a chance to prove itself to me the other day 
>when attempting to profile several different types of Hanhnemeule paper. Unfortunately, it 
>gave me poor results, with mottled and blochy colors. I didn't expect a lot out of it after 
>reading the reviews online. It did ok with the easier colors, however some of the darker 
>colors it did very poorly on. I sense this as a result of the paper, however isn't this what it's 
>supposed to help? I am not griping, just trying to make a point, somewhat.
>
>How much of an improvement can I expect with PFP, and is what I am hearing in the rumor 
>mill, true? (A PFP 2.0). If a new machine was slated for release at Photokina or Photo Plus 
>Expo NYC, how soon can one expect it to be shipping?
>
>I am looking for a product that will do 95% of the quality of the more expensive units at less 
>than half the price. Am I expecting too much?  Will the recent M&A of color companies will 
>some of the high quality tools make its way to the mainstream market more readily?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.