David, I bet sometimes you want to pull your hair out. With all the inks (with Epson changing them with every printer, and HP not far behind)... What I've always found, using PFP and several other profiling packages over time, is there are a million ways to make a mistake, and usually only one or two that produces perfection. Can be frustrating, but in my opinion PFP makes it simpler than most other packages. Try to make a profile with Onyx (my version was a couple of versions old), WAY too many bells and whistles, and they seem to find a new color engine with every release. It's one of the reasons I stopped using Onyx and began just making a profile for printing directly through the print driver. Between photoshop and Qimage, our workflow hasn't suffered. What I mean, is I feel your pain! :)))) -kris > > (See above). I'm not definitely blaming the paper; only pointing out > that if you print uncalibrated targets on a certain paper on a given > printer with a given ink, and the target patches are mottled to begin > with, you're heading for trouble. PFP wouldn't miraculously be able to > address this, either. (Nor would products costing 2-3X as much...:-) >
Message
RE: [colorvision_group] So what can we expect from CV in the near future
2006-09-16 by Kris
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.