CDT and David - thanks for response. I find the it does not seem to affect the overall reading as you indicate. --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 1/11/07 10:43:35 AM, doug@... writes: > > > > > > I have the GO setting on the Epson R1800 driver set to AUTO - I printed > > the targets from PrintFix Pro 2.0 software. > > > > Any thoughts out there? > > > > Well, my main thought is that way too much consideration has been given to > GLOP and its effects on profile building already. GLOP is mainly to fix an > optical effect (I'm tempted to say optical illusion <G>) in which inked and uninked > sections of the image, at close proximity, under extremely low light angle, > show an unpleasant difference in surface reflectivity. > > Patchreading devices work at a very precise 0/45 configuration where all the > light is supplied at 45 degrees to the surface, and all measurements occur at > zero degrees (perpendicular) to the surface (or in rare cases, the reverse). > So gloss differential won't even be perceived by a spectro, and the angle is > too tight. The white patch will, theoretically, read as a slightly different > white when GLOPped or not GLOPped, but if you put an image with GLOP on the main > image, but not the border, in a light box where the lightsource is 45 degrees > from the image plane, and your eye is perpendicular to the image plane, and > attempt to distingush where the edge of the GLOP zone is, and what difference > there is in the color of white in the two sections... well, I don't think you'll > see much that would concern you. > > Other details of the profile calculation process minimize the difference even > further. So overall, my level of concern about whether GLOP is or is not used > in the profiling process is pretty low. Whether its used in a given print is > a matter of how the print will be presented and displayed; if low level light > and low level viewing angles may occur, then GLOP is a real benefit. But in a > step-back matting system, under glass, on a wall with proper 0/45 lighting > viewing angles (as in a gallery), its as moot for viewing as it is for profiling. > > C. David Tobie > Product Technology Manager > ColorVision Business Unit > Datacolor Inc. > CDTobie@... > www.colorvision.com >
Message
Re: PFPro 2.0 - Printing Targets - GO?
2007-01-12 by douglenos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.