--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote: > >>2) When looking at profiles in Colorthink, those made with GMB > Profilemaker (with Atkinson 1728 patch target) show: > > 16 bit table, 33 grid points > 16 bit table, 33 grid points > > while those produced by Canon for the IPF5000 show: > > 8 bit table, 9 grid points > 8 bit table, 33 grid points > > No direct relation to bit depth, a coarser grid on the return side > of the profile (used only for previewing, not printing in most > circumstances) is just a space saver... the grid is how many > measurements there are, the bit depth is how many digits in each > measurement, so you would ideally want more in both... within > reason. Thanks, that answers most of my questions. Only have two more: 1) I take it that the "coarser grid on the return side" would be used for softproofing? Or does it have some other use? If so, seems that the softproof would be less accurate with the coarser grid. 2) Would the "coarser grid" cause the profile gamut to display incorrectly in Colorthink, or is that unrelated? 3) How do you get 33 grid points out of 1728 patches? Or are most of the grid points interpolated from the actual measured patches on the target? --John
Message
Re: 8 bit vs. 16 bit Profiles
2007-02-15 by John Hollenberg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.