Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

[SPAM] Re: [colorvision_group] Re: Initial info on the new Spyder3 line of prod

2007-10-19 by marko.mili

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "J Bryan Kramer"
<codeburner@...> wrote:
>
> From reading thru those links it seems that there is no advantage to
using
> L-star unless you are working in 8 bits. And working in 8 bits would
seem to
> be an odd plan for someone who is worried about color space issues and
> reading this list.
> 
> BK

My understanding of color theory and implementation of color
management is admittedly limited, but I don't think that statement is
entirely true. I realize that in 16 bits quantization errors are not
really an issue for any commonly used color space, but display on my
screen definitely changes when I use gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2, even when
looking at color managed images in Photoshop or Lightroom. It
certainly changes non-color managed portions of the display, so
perhaps my perception of what is light and dark inside a color managed
application is affected by that. In any case, I always felt that
shadows are blocked in 2.2 and that everything is too light in 1.8, so
I was hoping L-star would help with that.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.