On Jan 20, 2008, at 4:45 AM, boborlehanneton wrote: > PrintFixPro 2 > I read the message about "Show Edits in Preview" box. > > My prints are good and are similar to my screen. But the soft proof is > not contrasted as if there were a veil. > That "veil" is from your measured black. PrintFIX PRO 2 (which, by the way, you should upgrade to Spyder3Print) always softproofs using the measured black; which is never going to be a "perfect" RGB black. This produces reduced contrast in the softproof; more so if you're profiling a matte paper (higher "L" values for black, usually in the 18-24 range) rather than glossy or luster (much lower "L" values for black, usually in the 3 to 5 range). There's nothing you can do to change this in our software; Show Edits won't affect this. But in Photoshop, you can softproof with black ink simulation turned off (this is Photoshop's default). Go into View: Proof Setup:Custom in Photoshop, select the printer profile and rendering intent, and check the Preview box. > > Another issue: > - if I use the calibration base to calibrate the spectroclorimeter, > The word "if" should not appear here...:-) You should ALWAYS calibrate the spectro on the base; never on anything else! > > there is a blue cast on the white patch. If I don't compensate the > white point, white appears blue on soft proof (prints are good). If I > compensate the white point, soft proof is yellow. > There's supposed to be a blue cast on the white patch (meaning: the white of the paper that you're profiling/measuring); because that's the color of the paper. Most papers measure with a slight blue cast. When you softproof through the profile in PFP, the paper white is simulated that way because... that's how the paper measured...:-) "By the numbers", it's correct. We don't have a way in our software of turning off either the black ink simulation or paper white simulation in our softproof; if you want to softproof images that way, when you're printing real images after building a profile, you should be softproofing in Photoshop, which is where you'll actually be printing your images from. (So this comment goes along with the first one, about leaving black ink simulation turned off while softproofing in Photoshop; you'll probably find the closest perceptual match between your calibrated display, and print, by softproofing in Photoshop with both black ink and paper white simulation turned off) > > - if I calibrate the spectrocolorimeter on the paper (without white > point compensation), everything is ok (except contrast) and the prints > are nearly perfect. I know it is not the good way, but the result is > better... > > That's right, its not the good way, and it will throw all of your measurements off in subtle ways, so.... don't do it...! *** Spyder3Print All existing PrintFIX PRO users can download and install the latest (newly renamed) version of the software, Spyder3Print 3.0. You can download the installer from the Support:Software Updates download page. It has download links for both the OSX and Windows versions. I've attached a copy of the Update Notes to this ticket (please read these to see what the new features are, and also about how to install and how to copy over your older measurement files). Spyder3Print 3.0 can be initialized with your existing PrintFIX PRO serial number, and there are no changes in the Targets or the measurement file format, so it's completely backward compatible with everything you've already done. David Miller Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions Colorvision
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] good prints, bad soft proof
2008-01-20 by David Miller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.