On Jan 21, 2008, at 4:37 PM, boborlehanneton wrote: > that's all that I can do for the moment because I'm not at home until > friday. You can see what is the problem with cyan with the measures. > This must confirm your opinion about a device issue. > > The measure of the paper after calibration on the base is Lab: > (99.31,-0.28,-100.26) > > I will clean the spectro this WE but I cleaned it before the > calibration (without alcohol). > > I tried the ref black (automatic) but contrast is still bad in soft > proof. It is perhaps linked to the spectro issue but the prints are > good. > > If your paper white measures with -that- Lab value, then it's measuring (incorrectly) as CYAN, and the measured patch will look a colored cyan, it won't look anything like white at all. It should be perfectly obvious that what your measured value isn't coming in as paper white. Conclusion: a) Your spectro is bad, and needs replacement. b) You will never be able to build a good profile from the measurements. (So I don't understand "the prints are good" part of this) David Miller Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions Datacolor
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] Re: good prints, bad soft proof
2008-01-21 by David Miller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.