Datacolor User to User Support Group.

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, David Emerick <dnemerick@...> wrote:
>
> I¹ll second CD¹s suggestion. I am running a college lab for print and video
> and have been happy with the PrintFix / Spyder bundle. BIG difference in my
> profiles versus the canned!
> 
> 
> 
> D A V I D    E M E R I C K
> Digital Media Specialist
> St. Mary's College of Maryland
> 18952 East Fisher Road
> St. Mary's City, Maryland  20686
> 240 . 895 . 2034
> dnemerick@...
> http://staff.smcm.edu/dnemerick/
> http://emerick.blogspot.com
> http://smcmlibrary.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 3/31/08 12:47:05 PM, rasianator@... writes:
> 
> 
> does anyone have
> an opinion as to whether or not the Spyder3 would be sufficient in creating
> profiles for this
> type of environment or would we be better off spending the extra $$ for the
> higher end
> systems? For those of you with experience, is there a significantly
> noticeable difference
> between the quality of Epsons canned profiles vs those made with the
> Spyder3? Pardon my
> ignorance on the subject; this is my first venture into custom profiling and
> I want to be sure
> that purchasing a system will be money well spent. TIA
> 
> 
> 
> Well, I'm biased, but I would consider Spyder3Print to be fine for custom
> profiling inkjets and various media for a university program. I've certainly
> set it up for that a number of times, and seen a lot of success. So, the
> Spyder3Studio bundle (Print, plus Elite) would be what you would want. I'm
> sure others will give you some more specific pointers.
> 
> C. David Tobie
> WW Product Technology Manager
> Digital Imaging & Home Theater
> Datacolor
> CDTobie@...
> www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
>