>What I understood after reading Real World Color Management is that Relative maps white in the source to white in the destination and that it reproduces all in-gamut colors exactly while clipping out-of-gamut colors to the closest reproducible hue.___What intents are mostly about how to define that "closest reproducible hue"...Colorimeteric should offer equal emphasis on hue, saturation and brightness;thus the most literal match. Thats what our colorimetric intent does. Thatsnot what makes many photographic users happiest however.
>Jeff Schewe indicates that it preserves the overall tonal relationships better than most other options.___Yup, if you prefer literal to more colorful, its what you want. Not whatmost users are looking for from brilliant colors, however.>So I guess I am asking if that is also characteristic of you Relative rendering intent.___Yes, as defined above, it is.>I understood in an earlier reply from David Miller that your Saturation intent responds differently than most others as it has been optimized for photography.___Well, lets say it was optimized for photography first. The other companies weresufficiently embarrassed by our superior results that they more recently haveimproved their Saturation intents as well, though I believe ours is still superior.
>I think
that's great. I have ordered Spyder 3 Print, so I am just trying to understand a little bit about what's going on with the Relative setting as an option, even though I know you recommend saturation.___I recommend TRYING IT, which most users simply wouldn't do; give its common definitionof being for pie-charts, not photos. I don't recommend one intent over another, each hasits place, I simply recommend trying them, instead of using one recommended by a book,especially a book that does not have a good description of how our profiles function.I consider this a failure of the book to document how the major brands of profiling softwareactually function, not a failure of our profiles to act like the books describes.
What I actually recommend is using the softproof and gamut limit functions in Photoshop,with your custom printer profile, to determine what colors are out of gamut for yourprinter, ink, and paper, and to bring those colors into gamut yourself, to your own needsand artistic intent, instead of throwing them blindly at a profile, and hoping you willlike the way these colors were handled by the selected intent. Not practical for mostproduction work, but an important element of fine art printing...
C. David Tobie
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
CDTobie@...
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
www.colorvision.com
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
CDTobie@...
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
www.colorvision.com
-----Original Message-----
From: John Arnold
To: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:29 am
Subject: [colorvision_group] Re: Spyder 3 Print vs. Other Choices
--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, Cdtobie wrote: > > There is no "typical"; each company uses their own methods. But yes, > you can get results where out of gamut colors are brought into gamut > with equal priority to hue, saturation, and brightness by choosing > Relative Colorimetric. > What I understood after reading Real World Color Management is that Relative maps white in the source to white in the destination and that it reproduces all in-gamut colors exactly while clipping out-of-gamut colors to the closest reproducible hue. Jeff Schewe indicates that it preserves the overall tonal relationships better than most other options. So I guess I am asking if that is also characteristic of you Relative rendering intent. I understood in an earlier reply from David Miller that your Saturation intent responds differently than most others as it has been optimized for photography. I think that's great. I have ordered Spyder 3 Print, so I am just trying to understand a little bit about what's going on with the Relative setting as an option, even though I know you recommend saturation. Thanks, John ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <;*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colorvision_group/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colorvision_group/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:colorvision_group-digest@yahoogroups.com mailto:colorvision_group-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: colorvision_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/