Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re: Grayscale soft-proofing

2009-01-11 by John Arnold

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, Cdtobie <CDTobie@...> wrote:
>
> Your understanding of how to rebuild the profile with edits is  
> correct. But you would adjust the a/b values to the setting where they  
> gave you the softproof tone you desire, not simply to zero, though in  
> a perfect situation, that would do the trick for neutrality.
> 
> C. D. Tobie
> WW Product Technology Mngr.
> Digital Imaging & Home Theater
> DataColor.com
> CDTobie@...
> 
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:55 PM, "John Arnold" <john.arnold@...>  
> wrote:
> 
> > --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, cdtobie <CDTobie@>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Well, your paper tone is one reason, and your paper whiteners
> > could be another. Adjust the a*/b* values in the "Ref White" box and
> > rebuild your profile, to adjust the softproof tint.
> >> --
> >
> > Thanks. I have two questions regarding what you have recommended?
> >
> > 1) By adjusting my a*/b* values in the "Ref White" box do you mean
> > setting them both to zero?
> >
> > 2) In order to rebuild a profile, do I just choose the file where
> > the targets are saved that were originally used to build the profile
> > and then proceed to the next page where you build the profile? I
> > assume that's right as I don't know of any other way to call up an
> > existing profile to tweak it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >

Hi,

I have been thinking about this post and wanted to revisit. The paper I am using does in 
fact measure on the cyan side of white. a*/b* values are both slightly negative when I 
measure with the spectro and I only get the slight greenish cast when I check the 
"simulate paper white" box in Photoshop's proofing setup menu. So in reality, it appears to 
be correct. 

Thinking about this prompted me to ask why when I calibrate the spectro, that the b* 
value is always in the negative -1.32 range. I have noticed in the past that others who 
post to this site also frequently get negative b* values that are in the same range when 
they calibrate. I figure that's not accidental and maybe has something to do with 
compensating for paper whiteners or some such thing. I am curious as slight cast in the 
highlights are often more noticeable than cast elsewhere and I am trying to better 
understand how the product works so that I can correctly compensate for this type of 
thing when tweaking profiles. 

Hope the above makes sense.

Thanks,

John

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.