Hi, David, --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > But sRGB is the most common standard of all: Gamma 2.2 . . . Well, not really, quite. > . . . Whitepoint 6500 . . . Well, not really, quite. > . . .Spyder3Pro not only will do that one, it defaults to it. There > is no way to build a true "sRGB" target, and targets do not define > a display's primary saturations. But the profile defines them, and > a color managed application uses those definitions to show color > saturation correctly. I understand. > We have actually changed our whitepoint definition in terms of the > x,y, values since OptiCAL, so they are probably already what you want. Good. > But let me stress that anyone who cares about the miniscule difference > between varying definitions of 6500 should be using Spyder3Elite, not Pro... Yes, and I am not really concerned over those small differences. It was just really an "intellectual" matter for me. > ... you really need to do the Pro>Elite upgrade. Indeed, as soon as the stock market goes up a little! Right now, my curiosity isn't worth the $99.00! Thanks for your insights. Best regards, Doug
Message
Re: Target definitions
2009-05-27 by Doug Kerr
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.