Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Yes, you can use the larger medium gray patch in the lower left image  
in SpyderProof, printed directly from Spyder3Print, to check measured  
neutrality of midtones. Actually, any point in that image will give  
you a neutrality measurement.

C. D. Tobie
Global Product Technology Mngr.
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor.com
CDTobie@...

On Sep 3, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Bob Petruska <petruska@...>  
wrote:

>
>
> Bob S.
>
> What grey color would you like me to measure and how do I do that?
>
> Should I go into Photoshop and make a grey square with designated  
> RGB values?
>
> Then print the square using my Spyder generated profile, then  
> measure using the Spectro?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Bob P.
>
>
>
>
> At 03:17 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com
>> [ mailto:datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of C D Tobie
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:04 AM
>> To: datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [datacolor_group] Re: Spyder3Print profiles worse than  
>> standard
>> Canon driver? [1 Attachment]
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:19 PM, Bob Petruska wrote:
>>
>> > Ran the same as 2 above, got the same results; printout is slightly
>> > color saturated, towards red tint, soft-proof slightly washed out
>> > and fixed it with the soft-proof black level. Canon Standard Driver
>> > matches the original image very well. I would like to say that this
>> > printer is one huge printer and I really can't see any printout
>> > detail differences against the I950.
>>
>> As for color tint, we really can't talk about that without discussing
>> what lighting is involved.
>>
>> Hi CD,
>>
>> Thanks for monitoring this site the way you do, it is very  
>> informative.
>>
>> As for the tint that Bob P is experiencing, could he measure a grey  
>> patch
>> with the Spyder Spectro and report the results? This would remove any
>> lighting consideration and maybe give a clue as to how to correct.  
>> Or, am I
>> off base here?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bob Schoner
>>
>
>
> 
>