>In a message dated 3/15/06 2:33:24 PM, ttrostel@... writes: > >>I get 1.4 with the R1800. Nice and dark. >> > > >I'm not sure that I would call a d-max of 1.4 nice and dark, even >for watercolor paper, but its better than some printers will produce >with this media. I don't like to use matte art papers with less than >a Status T d-max of 1.5, and would really prefer something closer to >1.7... its a never ending quest! > On the Epson 4800 with K3 inks, I get a density of 1.57 for black, using the standard Epson media setting for Watercolor. I've done some test prints on WaterColor Radiant White on the 4800 and they're very pleasing. I also like the fact that WCR handles easily and is fairly inexpensive in cut sheets ($1 or less a sheet for 13x19, depending on where you get it). Contrast this to Epson Ultrasmooth fine art, which I've also done a fair amount of printing on. Ultrasmooth produces a density of 1.58 for black (so essentially, the same!) and can be printed on at 2880, but is more expensive, more yellow, and it's not a lot of fun dealing with it on a roll, cutting it up, and then eliminating the curl. -- David Miller Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions ColorVision
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] Re: Epson Radient White Watercolor - Patches look really light
2006-03-15 by David Miller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.