Yes! Absolutely, I am learning more from this thread than all the others put together and am saving them. David Pal "Thats great to hear. One of the goals of discussing this stuff in > public is to spread knowledge to more than the one party who would > hear about it in a support ticket. I as sometimes concerned, when > things get too technical, that I may not be reaching a larger > audience; that the somewhat splintered format of an email forum or > digest might lose people's focus. So its nice to get some feedback > that there are others still following the thread, and learning a few > things from it." > ----- Original Message ----- From: "C D Tobie" <CDTobie@...> To: <datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 6:52 AM Subject: Re: [datacolor_group] Re: Spyder3Print profiles worse than standard Canon driver? [1 Attachment] > > On Sep 4, 2009, at 12:09 AM, dsainsbu wrote: > >> Thanks guys for your patience and persistance. >> I am learning more from this thread than any number of publications. > > Thats great to hear. One of the goals of discussing this stuff in > public is to spread knowledge to more than the one party who would > hear about it in a support ticket. I as sometimes concerned, when > things get too technical, that I may not be reaching a larger > audience; that the somewhat splintered format of an email forum or > digest might lose people's focus. So its nice to get some feedback > that there are others still following the thread, and learning a few > things from it. > > C. David Tobie > Global Product Technology Manager > Digital Imaging & Home Theater > CDTobie@... > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Datacolor > www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 > >
Message
Re: [datacolor_group] Re: Spyder3Print profiles worse than standard Canon driver? [1 Attachment]
2009-09-04 by magickPal
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.