Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re:Spyder3 used to create Photo Rag profile - Gamut Problem?

2010-06-01 by rickbehl

Actually I am starting to look at prints as mentioned in my last message but what I want to ascertain is why when I am creating profiles using the Spyder3 it seems all the ones I have produced for matte papers are showing large areas of out of gamut colors in Photoshop. I would like to know whether that is symptomatic of some fundamental problem in my process or equipment or whatever... Obviously the best way to check the quality of profiles is to look at real prints but heh, paper doesn't grow on trees (well, not quite) and it ain't cheap !

So any problems I can address before getting to the hard print evaluation stage is going to save me time and money... both of which I am not rolling in right now...

Thanks
Rick


--- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote:
>
> >>So I used my previous measurement file but then added a Shadow Detail adjustment at +5%, +10%, +15% and +20%. However I must have got my thinking wrong as this ended up creating even more out-of-gamut areas. 
> 
> Your mistake,nas before, is to take the gamut warnings too literally.  Look at the resulting PRINTS and see if they have the shadow tone and detail you are looking for.
> 
> C. David Tobie
> Global Product Technology Manager
> Digital Imaging and Home Theater
> Datacolor inc. 
> cdtobie@...
> www.datacolor.com
> 
> On May 31, 2010, at 10:22 AM, "rickbehl" <RickBehl@...> wrote:
> 
> > So I used my previous measurement file but then added a Shadow Detail adjustment at +5%, +10%, +15% and +20%. However I must have got my thinking wrong as this ended up creating even more out-of-gamut areas.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.