Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re: [datacolor_group] Re: SpyderLensCal - a real world review

2010-10-16 by Vampire D

As you mentioned in that post, I am having a hard time with some lenses as it is very difficult to really pick the right one. I have one lens that I really hate but use it because it is the best lens for the 7D (17-55 f/2.8) and the one I have to use most often. I know it is off but I can't quite get it right, it frequently disappoints me and it has been sent to Canon in the past.

I've been trying to fix it with the SpyderLensCal but I haven't been having much luck. I was shooting wine bottle and seem to be noticing the difference more, but even at f/2.8 the DOF is large enough to make the test difficult.


"Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look just like the criminal they are playing?"

Christopher



On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM, keith <yg_1@northlight-images.co.uk> wrote:

--- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, Vampire D wrote:

> I would like to check it out and see how it works compared to LensAlign.

I wrote up a review a while ago

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews/photography/spyderlenscal.html

It works just fine - it doesn't need to be any more complex

My thoughts after testing it are that the sense of heightened accuracy and precision required after looking at all the LensAlign sales pitches is almost entirely spurious.

The oft quoted requirement for absolute parallelism is much overrated and you can set up the SpyderlensCal perfectly well by eye.

I'm sure that many people who've tried to set AF microadjustment have been slightly disappointed by the lack of apparent precision they've encountered.

Add to this the rather vocal part of photography that thinks that better (read $$$) equipment will be the answer to their perceived failings, and you have an ideal market to sell expensive and IMHO unnecessarily precise alignment equipment.

Having set up optical systems in the past, I know where extreme precision makes a difference, and lens AF microadjustment really does not fall into the category that some might want to believe.

As someone from a technical background I just don';t like seeing spurious engineering precision being used to market needlessly overcomplex and overpriced solutions to questionable problems.

Of course the real problem is that (IMHO) rather too many people have let themselves believe that there is a technical ($$$) fix to improving their photography when the real answer is learning more about their own drives/interests/motivations/vision - oops, sorry, that takes real effort :-) :-)

Anyway minor rant over - the SpyderLensCal works just fine ;-)

bye for now
Keith Cooper


Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.