One of the points I was trying to make might have been overlooked because this is primarily a Color newsgroup. I referred to the need for reliable color rendition so that in working up an image for black and white that the tones of the color would be more accurately related to the corresponding tones of grayscale tones. There is a very good website www.zuberphotographics.com that speaks in detail of this. Your friend in Photography, Johnny Eades --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 5/11/06 9:03:28 AM, ttrostel@... writes: > > > > Is there then a compelling reason to use strict color calibration on > > the input end other than fixing extreme lighting conditions? > > > > For certain forms of technical documentation (museums documenting their > artwork, for example) the most literal and exact match is wanted. More often its a > matter of trade colors for a company, where "fixing" them after the fact is > more practical, and generally would still be required even if a profile was > used. For fine art photography, its artistic intent, not camera output, that > matters, and correcting visually on screen with a calibrated monitor is the usual > choice, though getting the best built in profiles, and the mosts convenient > tools, in your RAW convertor make this process as painless as possible. > > C. David Tobie > Product Technology Manager > ColorVision Business Unit > Datacolor Inc. > CDTobie@... > www.colorvision.com >
Message
Re: Calibrating your Camera
2006-05-11 by Johnny Eades
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.