I was under the impression that LCD screens (I have a Toshiba laptop) would not give an accurate preview within Photoshop of the finished print, until I purchased the Printfix Pro Suite and used the Spyder2 pro to calibrate the screen. Now I feel that that screen is better suited to Photoshop than my older NEC CRT monitor. This may be my imagination, but the finished prints are the proof of the pudding; so to speak. Your friend in Photography, Johnny Eades > > There are a few issues with this system. First, it will leave all > uncolormanaged elements (like images in Windows web browsers, for example, or even the > Windows desktop, for that matter) uncorrected (and on an LCD this means REALLY > uncorrected). Second, this scheme depends on the application to apply a more > complex form of gamma corrections, one that some applications do not process. I > can even recall a version of Adobe Acrobat that didn't process this type of > profile gamma definitions correctly. Thirdly, this is not the standard method, > proven and accepted by most experts. > > So yes, these are possible methods, that others currently support, and that > ColorVision will consider supporting when we can verify that they actually > offer advantages, not just marketing spin. In the meantime, I wonder why LowLife > bothers to belong to this list, when most of his posts are this type of > ColorVision criticism? > > C David Tobie > Product Technology Manager > ColorVision Inc. > CDTobie@... >
Message
Re: Gammas?
2006-05-27 by Johnny Eades
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.