Dark prints on R1800
2007-06-16 by Herwin Jan Steehouwer
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC
Thread
2007-06-16 by Herwin Jan Steehouwer
Hi, I have a Epson R1800 and the test image is dark! Lots of patches almost look black. I tested with Epson Premium Glossy. This is the image when i try to profile my paper:
2007-06-16 by David Miller
>Hi, > >I have a Epson R1800 and the test image is dark! Lots of patches >almost look black. It's supposed to be that way. When you print the test image with color management turned off (as you're supposed to); it comes out dark, and measures that way, exactly as you're seeing. You haven't built a PROFILE yet. When you build a profile from the measurements; and then USE that profile when you print "real" images; it will compensate for the darkness of the test print (as well as color shifts and other idiosyncracies of the non-color-managed printer). -- David Miller Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions ColorVision
2007-06-16 by Herwin Jan Steehouwer
2007-06-16 by Ghi Stecyk
you're not doing anything wrong. this is just how the target prints out. the whole concept of profiling is to calibrate according to the limited potential of your printer. you will never get colors out of your printer that match the pure RGB of a monitor. it's all about finding the next best color match that your printer ink can produce. the target pushes the colors, then from the measurements the software adjusts the output via a completed profile. you have to proceed through the entire process and create a profile before you can see how a good profile can help you predict your output. ghi
On 16-Jun-07, at 6:53 AM, Herwin Jan Steehouwer wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Epson R1800 and the test image is dark! Lots of patches > almost look black. > I tested with Epson Premium Glossy. > > >
2007-06-16 by David Miller
>Hi, > >Thanx for the quick answer! > >What about this question: >? >A1, B1 etc are measured Grey. Is this normal? > >On the paper they look realy black! How-come that they are measured grey, is this normal? > They will always "look" lighter (more gray) than the "pure" patches in the split view; what really matters is what the L,a,b values of the measurements are. First of all: to "see" your measurements better, get out of the Split display, using the popup in the lower right corner of the Target window, and switch to Measured mode, instead. This way you'll see only the measured values in the entire patch; less distracting and more useful than the Split mode. Move the cursor to the different boxes, and read the values in the bottom of the Target window. If you've calibrated the spectro; and measured correctly; you should find that the darkest patch (smallest L value) is 1A, which is perfect black. Looking at your attachment, that doesn't appear to be the case; I can't see L values for these, but using an on-screen digital meter, your 1A measurement is lighter than 1C and 1D. So: you may not have measured those patches correctly; maybe you overlapped the measurement tip onto the white gaps between the patches; you might need to go back, check, and remeasure these. On Premium Glossy on the R1800, you should be getting very small L value for black (around 5, maybe even a bit less). More than that isn't correctly; and if you look at your actual target print, you should also SEE (visually) that 1A is darker (or at least, visibly as dark) as 1B through 1E. It shouldn't start off lighter and then get darker (as your attachment looks) as you go across. Also, make sure you've calibrated your SPECTRO correctly: on the white round tile on the calibration base; not on the paper. (PFP 2.1 has a picture of the spectro sitting on the calibration base to make sure this is clear). If your L for the black patch is more than about 5; and if 1C and 1D are actually darker (smaller L values than 1A); then something's not right in those first couple of meausurements; either go back and remeasure them; or start over and remeasure the entire target more carefully; using Measured mode the entire time, so you can better see what's happening; pay attention to some of the Lab values as you measure, those darker patches in particular; and make sure that they're behaving correctly. Best regards, -- David Miller Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions ColorVision
2007-06-16 by Herwin Jan Steehouwer
>Hi,
>
>Thanx for the quick answer!
>
>What about this question:
>?
>A1, B1 etc are measured Grey. Is this normal?
>
>On the paper they look realy black! How-come that they are measured grey, is this normal?
>
They will always "look" lighter (more gray) than the "pure" patches in the
split view; what really matters is what the L,a,b values of the measurements
are.
First of all: to "see" your measurements better, get out of the Split display,
using the popup in the lower right corner of the Target window, and switch
to Measured mode, instead. This way you'll see only the measured values in the
entire patch; less distracting and more useful than the Split mode.
Move the cursor to the different boxes, and read the values in the bottom
of the Target window. If you've calibrated the spectro; and measured correctly;
you should find that the darkest patch (smallest L value) is 1A, which is
perfect black.
Looking at your attachment, that doesn't appear to be the case; I can't
see L values for these, but using an on-screen digital meter, your 1A
measurement is lighter than 1C and 1D. So: you may not have measured those
patches correctly; maybe you overlapped the measurement tip onto the white
gaps between the patches; you might need to go back, check, and remeasure
these.
On Premium Glossy on the R1800, you should be getting very small L value for
black (around 5, maybe even a bit less). More than that isn't correctly; and
if you look at your actual target print, you should also SEE (visually) that
1A is darker (or at least, visibly as dark) as 1B through 1E. It shouldn't start
off lighter and then get darker (as your attachment looks) as you go across.
Also, make sure you've calibrated your SPECTRO correctly: on the white round
tile on the calibration base; not on the paper. (PFP 2.1 has a picture of the
spectro sitting on the calibration base to make sure this is clear).
If your L for the black patch is more than about 5; and if 1C and 1D are
actually darker (smaller L values than 1A); then something's not right in those
first couple of meausurements; either go back and remeasure them; or start
over and remeasure the entire target more carefully; using Measured mode the
entire time, so you can better see what's happening; pay attention to some of
the Lab values as you measure, those darker patches in particular; and make
sure that they're behaving correctly.
__._,_Best regards,
--
David Miller
Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions
ColorVision
2007-06-18 by S. Prior
Herwin, could you verify something for me. When I do the media settings check it does not seem to matter which media I chose, it always lays down the same
2007-06-21 by Herwin Jan Steehouwer
Ok,A1 = 4.25 0,00 0,33B1 = 4,51 0,30 1,14C1 = 7,50 4,43 -2,87So you are right, the meter sees difference!After profiling the prints look to green, i will retry with newly printed patches to see if it make any different.Herwin JanOn 16-jun-2007, at 20:11, David Miller wrote:>Hi,
>
>Thanx for the quick answer!
>
>What about this question:
>?
>A1, B1 etc are measured Grey. Is this normal?
>
>On the paper they look realy black! How-come that they are measured grey, is this normal?
>
They will always "look" lighter (more gray) than the "pure" patches in the
split view; what really matters is what the L,a,b values of the measurements
are.
First of all: to "see" your measurements better, get out of the Split display,
using the popup in the lower right corner of the Target window, and switch
to Measured mode, instead. This way you'll see only the measured values in the
entire patch; less distracting and more useful than the Split mode.
Move the cursor to the different boxes, and read the values in the bottom
of the Target window. If you've calibrated the spectro; and measured correctly;
you should find that the darkest patch (smallest L value) is 1A, which is
perfect black.
Looking at your attachment, that doesn't appear to be the case; I can't
see L values for these, but using an on-screen digital meter, your 1A
measurement is lighter than 1C and 1D. So: you may not have measured those
patches correctly; maybe you overlapped the measurement tip onto the white
gaps between the patches; you might need to go back, check, and remeasure
these.
On Premium Glossy on the R1800, you should be getting very small L value for
black (around 5, maybe even a bit less). More than that isn't correctly; and
if you look at your actual target print, you should also SEE (visually) that
1A is darker (or at least, visibly as dark) as 1B through 1E. It shouldn't start
off lighter and then get darker (as your attachment looks) as you go across.
Also, make sure you've calibrated your SPECTRO correctly: on the white round
tile on the calibration base; not on the paper. (PFP 2.1 has a picture of the
spectro sitting on the calibration base to make sure this is clear).
If your L for the black patch is more than about 5; and if 1C and 1D are
actually darker (smaller L values than 1A); then something's not right in those
first couple of meausurements; either go back and remeasure them; or start
over and remeasure the entire target more carefully; using Measured mode the
entire time, so you can better see what's happening; pay attention to some of
the Lab values as you measure, those darker patches in particular; and make
sure that they're behaving correctly.
__._,_Best regards,
--
David Miller
Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions
ColorVision
2007-06-21 by CDTobie@aol.com
2007-06-21 by Herwin Jan Steehouwer
In a message dated 6/21/07 2:26:21 PM, herwin@steehouwer.nu writes:
My calibrate white tile is LAB = 89,73 -0,98 -1,40
is this right?
Yes, that would be correct...
I notice commas where Americans use decimal points, but our software deals with that okay. Dot.ru in an email address implies Russia. We don't (yet! ) offer PrintFIX PRO in Russian, so I assume you are using one of the nine included languages. Are you doing that on a Russian language computer?
C. David Tobie
Product Technology Manager
ColorVision Business Unit
Datacolor Inc.
CDTobie@colorvision.com
www.colorvision.com
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
2007-06-21 by CDTobie@aol.com