Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Thread

prints too dark

prints too dark

2010-02-24 by bill_hansen20012001

Sorry for a question which has probably been answered often. I'm just getting back to photo printing, and I've forgotten a lot of things.

Windows 7 - LCD monitor profiled with Spyder3Elite.

Using Spyder3Print, I made a printer profile using the 720 patch target. The colors are spot on, but the prints are significantly too dark. At first I thought an adjustment of +5 brightness would be sufficient, but after further testing I see that at least +9 or 10 brightness is needed, along with a -3 adjustment in saturation. That seems like it's too much adjustment. The black and white points in the profile seem okay.

I think I remember from a couple of years ago that if prints are too dark, it means that the monitor brightness has been set too high. I tried reducing monitor brightness (from 69 to 52) and then re-profiling the monitor, but that hasn't seemed to affect the overly dark prints.

I know I can bring the prints into line by just bumping up brightness and/or reducing saturation as I re-edit my printer profiles, but it seems that I souldn't have to make such a large adjustment.

Any guidance is welcome

Bill Hansen

Re: [datacolor_group] prints too dark

2010-02-25 by David Miller

A too dark print means that you've printed the target incorrectly;

You must have forgotten to turn off color management when you printed  
it.

The result is a too-light target print that will produce a too-dark  
print when you use the profile in Photoshop.

David Miller
Datacolor
>

Re: prints too dark

2010-02-25 by bill_hansen20012001

Ouch!!! You are correct! And double checking that  color management is completely off is a thing I've tried to do every single time I print anything photographic. This time I thought I had turned of CM, but I had not. Carelessness, nothing more or less. 

I'm printing out the 225 patch target now, and assuming that yields reasonable levels of brightness/saturation, I'll repeat the 729 patch target as soon as I can get back to it.

Thanks very much for that correction.

Bill

--- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, David Miller <dm2363@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A too dark print means that you've printed the target incorrectly;
> 
> You must have forgotten to turn off color management when you printed  
> it.
> 
> The result is a too-light target print that will produce a too-dark  
> print when you use the profile in Photoshop.
> 
> David Miller
> Datacolor
> >
>

Re: prints too dark

2010-02-26 by bill_hansen20012001

I guess I spoke too soon. Printer is an Epson R1800. I printed out the 225 patch target after making double sure that in the Advanced settings of the printer driver ICM was chosen and then turned OFF. Let the new target print dry down for about 4 hours and then made a new printer profile. Printed a test pic, and again it was way too dark. In fact, this one is further off (darker, oversaturated) than the profile from the 729 patch target I made a couple of days ago.

Both of these printer targets, the 729 patch one and the 225 patch one, are unusually dark. Many colors appear to be black, though I know they must actually be patches of color.

Any further suggestions?

Bill

The targets, both the 

--- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, David Miller <dm2363@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A too dark print means that you've printed the target incorrectly;
> 
> You must have forgotten to turn off color management when you printed  
> it.
> 
> The result is a too-light target print that will produce a too-dark  
> print when you use the profile in Photoshop.
> 
> David Miller
> Datacolor
> >
>

Re: prints too dark

2010-02-26 by VM

Are you running Mac OS Snow Leopard by chance? I have the same experience with R1800. I think, Epson drivers for R1800 are not fully compatible with SL although Epson claims they are.

SV

Re: [datacolor_group] Re: prints too dark

2010-02-26 by David Miller

On Feb 25, 2010, at 9:32 PM, bill_hansen20012001 wrote:

> I guess I spoke too soon. Printer is an Epson R1800. I printed out  
> the 225 patch target after making double sure that in the Advanced  
> settings of the printer driver ICM was chosen and then turned OFF.  
> Let the new target print dry down for about 4 hours and then made a  
> new printer profile. Printed a test pic, and again it was way too  
> dark. In fact, this one is further off (darker, oversaturated) than  
> the profile from the 729 patch target I made a couple of days ago.
>
> Both of these printer targets, the 729 patch one and the 225 patch  
> one, are unusually dark. Many colors appear to be black, though I  
> know they must actually be patches of color.
>
> Any further suggestions?
>
>
Yes...:-)

If the -target prints- are dark; as they should be
(and from what you're saying, they are); then it's
impossible to make a too-dark print from building
a profile from them... assuming that you're actually
USING the profile that you've built, and using it
correctly. If you don't use it correctly: then
yes, your print of a real image will still be too
dark, because you'll either be printing without a
profile, or you'll be setting up Photoshop incorrectly
and disabling color management when you print.

First: the way you can test, without having to worry
about Photoshop's configurations, is to do a test print
directly from the SpyderProof-View screen in the S3P
4.x software, after building a profile. Click Print,
then go into the driver settings and make sure it's
all the same as when you printed the target, and that
should give you a perfect print. (Check!) With the
target print and measurements you're describing, that
should turn out fine. So now I'm going to list exactly
how everything should be set up in Photoshop; it's
going to be one of "these" things that you're doing
wrong:

This is how you use the profile in Photoshop:

- Your RGB working space (in the Color Settings dialog)
should be set to sRGB or Adobe RGB; never to a display
profile or a printer profile!

- Use Photoshop's Print command as follows (look at the
Color Management controls over on the right side of the
Print dialog):

     - Choose Document (not Proof!). You should see the
name of your working space profile show up to the right
of the Document button. Repeat: do NOT choose Proof,
this is wrong! You're not printing as a cross-proof
from one printer to another; that's what this setting
would be for.

     - Select "Photoshop Manages Colors" beneath that.
(this means that Photoshop will apply the printer
profile before the image is sent to the printer driver)

     - Beneath that, select the printer profile you've
created with Spyder3Print. Also select the Saturation
intent and turn black point compensation off.

- When you continue: you'll then need to select the
proper paper type, output quality/resolution and color
management OFF in the printer driver. (How you do this,
exactly, will vary depending on whether you're using
OSX or Windows, and also, on which printer and printer
driver you're using). In general, you'll need to set
the printer driver up exactly the same as when you
originally printed the target image.


David Miller
Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions
Datacolor

Re: prints too dark

2010-02-27 by bill_hansen20012001

The OS is Win 7. 

I've used ColorVision-DataColor profiling products since about 2002 and (in general) I've been very happy with them, especially the recent Spyder products. 

Now, however, there is no question that I'm doing something radically wrong, and I can't see what it is. The fault is in me and my workflow, not in the SpyderPrint profile, which prints normally when using the SpyderView proofing function within the SpyderPrint program.

I've followed David Miller's advice (see his note above in this thread) compulsively, three times now, after printing out his email and following it step by step to be sure I'm doing everything the way he recommends - which is also the way I've been doing things all along except that I normally print from Qimage, not from PhotoShop [but I followed Mr Miller's recommendations and printed from PS this time]. The result has always been the same - extremely dark prints which might or might not come to resemble the monitor appearance if I adjusted brightness to about a + 15 to 20 level when editing my profile.

I've tried the canned Epson profile for Epson Premium Luster paper, and the result is again the same - prints way too dark to be of any use.

Somewhere in my work flow, I think I must be double profiling - but where, and how?

If anyone has any further suggestions for me, I'll be very grateful. Otherwise, it seems that my choices are to try the most severe sort of "adjusting" [editing] of the SpyderPrint profiles. Right now I can't think of anything else to do.

Bill

--- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, VM <hlhelper@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Are you running Mac OS Snow Leopard by chance? I have the same experience with R1800. I think, Epson drivers for R1800 are not fully compatible with SL although Epson claims they are.
> 
> SV
>

Re: prints too dark

2010-02-27 by tlbepson

>>"bill_hansen20012001" <b2hansen@...>: Somewhere in my work flow, I think I must be double profiling - but where, and how?

I'm still using XP so I'm not sure if Win7 has the same set up BUT have you (guessing the process is the same) checked the Properties > Color Management settings for your printer to see what is set there?

Is it set to Automatic? Also, what profiles are listed? If it's set to Automatic, that may be where your double profiling might be coming from.

Terrie
http://tlbtlb.com/
tlbtlb@...

Re: [datacolor_group] Re: prints too dark

2010-02-27 by David Miller

On Feb 27, 2010, at 9:41 AM, bill_hansen20012001 wrote:

> The OS is Win 7.
>
> I've used ColorVision-DataColor profiling products since about 2002  
> and (in general) I've been very happy with them, especially the  
> recent Spyder products.
>
> Now, however, there is no question that I'm doing something  
> radically wrong, and I can't see what it is. The fault is in me and  
> my workflow, not in the SpyderPrint profile, which prints normally  
> when using the SpyderView proofing function within the SpyderPrint  
> program.
>
> I've followed David Miller's advice (see his note above in this  
> thread) compulsively, three times now, after printing out his email  
> and following it step by step to be sure I'm doing everything the  
> way he recommends - which is also the way I've been doing things all  
> along except that I normally print from Qimage, not from PhotoShop  
> [but I followed Mr Miller's recommendations and printed from PS this  
> time]. The result has always been the same - extremely dark prints  
> which might or might not come to resemble the monitor appearance if  
> I adjusted brightness to about a + 15 to 20 level when editing my  
> profile.
>
> I've tried the canned Epson profile for Epson Premium Luster paper,  
> and the result is again the same - prints way too dark to be of any  
> use.
>
> Somewhere in my work flow, I think I must be double profiling - but  
> where, and how?
>
> If anyone has any further suggestions for me, I'll be very grateful.  
> Otherwise, it seems that my choices are to try the most severe sort  
> of "adjusting" [editing] of the SpyderPrint profiles. Right now I  
> can't think of anything else to do.
>
> Bill
>
>
>

Bill:

I think we've been down this road once before, but let's
do it again. Can you email me a copy of your measurement file?
(not the profile that you've built). Use the File:Open Data
command in Spyder3Print to open the folder that contains your
measurement files; they're all small text files with .xml
extensions.


David Miller
Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions
Datacolor

Re: [datacolor_group] Re: prints too dark

2010-02-28 by Sat Tara Khalsa

David,
Given that this problem seems ubiquitous, wouldn't it make sense to build a utility into S3P to check status of all print parameters and any other color management settings and set to "off" before printing targets?
stsk

On Feb 27, 2010, at 4:51 PM, David Miller wrote:


On Feb 27, 2010, at 9:41 AM, bill_hansen20012001 wrote:

> The OS is Win 7.
>
> I've used ColorVision-DataColor profiling products since about 2002
> and (in general) I've been very happy with them, especially the
> recent Spyder products.
>
> Now, however, there is no question that I'm doing something
> radically wrong, and I can't see what it is. The fault is in me and
> my workflow, not in the SpyderPrint profile, which prints normally
> when using the SpyderView proofing function within the SpyderPrint
> program.
>
> I've followed David Miller's advice (see his note above in this
> thread) compulsively, three times now, after printing out his email
> and following it step by step to be sure I'm doing everything the
> way he recommends - which is also the way I've been doing things all
> along except that I normally print from Qimage, not from PhotoShop
> [but I followed Mr Miller's recommendations and printed from PS this
> time]. The result has always been the same - extremely dark prints
> which might or might not come to resemble the monitor appearance if
> I adjusted brightness to about a + 15 to 20 level when editing my
> profile.
>
> I've tried the canned Epson profile for Epson Premium Luster paper,
> and the result is again the same - prints way too dark to be of any
> use.
>
> Somewhere in my work flow, I think I must be double profiling - but
> where, and how?
>
> If anyone has any further suggestions for me, I'll be very grateful.
> Otherwise, it seems that my choices are to try the most severe sort
> of "adjusting" [editing] of the SpyderPrint profiles. Right now I
> can't think of anything else to do.
>
> Bill
>
>
>

Bill:

I think we've been down this road once before, but let's
do it again. Can you email me a copy of your measurement file?
(not the profile that you've built). Use the File:Open Data
command in Spyder3Print to open the folder that contains your
measurement files; they're all small text files with .xml
extensions.

David Miller
Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions
Datacolor


Re: [datacolor_group] Re: prints too dark

2010-02-28 by David Miller

On Feb 28, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Sat Tara Khalsa wrote:

> David,
>
> Given that this problem seems ubiquitous, wouldn't it make sense to  
> build a utility into S3P to check status of all print parameters and  
> any other color management settings and set to "off" before printing  
> targets?
> stsk
>
>

Wish that we could, but there's no way of doing this. We have
no way of "pushing the buttons" in any of the print dialogs to
turn color management off; and these controls vary widely,
from printer to printer, driver to driver, and OS to OS.

It's not possible to check print parameters, because these
are all handled completely in the manufacturer's printer
drivers themselves; we have no access to that information.

We document it as best we can, and tell people to turn off
all color management in their printer drivers. We also have
some demo videos up on our web site that stress this, and
show how it's done for several different printers for both
Mac and Windows, here:

http://spyder.datacolor.com/learn_videos.php


David Miller
Senior Software Developer, Digital Color Solutions
Datacolor

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.