With respect, I strongly disagree that you should be notating by hand into the computer. Any good MIDI sequencing software can do what is required, far better than mucking around step recording by hand. I use Midi Maestro for the same thing, and I'm sure Cakewalk and others can do it... The only trick is that you have to play the piece using the metronome (either on the DKV and then transfer the recorded piece to your PC, or I prefer using a click metronome track on the PC and recording directly to the sequencer program). So forget your rits, accells and so on. You have to re-insert these manually with tempo changes once you're editing the final result. On the other hand, you will get a far better MIDI file (one you might actually want to listen to, at least), as all phrasing, dynamics and so on are faithfully recorded. Any reasonable MIDI software will transcribe playing to the correct approximation of musical notation, or can be told where they get it wrong. And, of course, it's loads more fun and much much quicker. The only time you might get into trouble is with really wacky free- form jazz or similar. Although I would have thought this would still be better than step-entering the information. --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, Robert Welcyng <rwelcyng@a...> wrote: > That is, it is unrealistic to expect that you can play and record some piece to MIDI and that a program will automatically roll out pages of finished notation. > > ...you would use your time much more effectively by starting with a notation application such as Sibelius and entering your piece in notation including indications of tempo, dynamics, crescendos, ritards, repeats, etc. > > Kinara Hanba wrote: > > Greetings everyone, > > > > I do a bit of music writing and would like to use the piano to imput some of my own stuff, and I want it to also save as transcribed music.
Message
Re: Composing by computer vs. directly
2004-01-06 by tillsbury2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.