That's a cool idea. Thanks for the explanation. Gotta try that out. It may be wasteful but you always can back up right? Great idea for a new machine too. --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "crixmadine71" <nate@o...> wrote: > > Basically, here is what I did: > > 1) In the MD, I programmed 8 patterns (lets say A1 thru A8) with 2 > steps each. But when all 8 patterns are chained, it sounds like a 16 > step pattern. > > 2) Then in the global menu I mapped different program change numbers > to each of the 8 patterns. > > 3) In the Rev, I programmed the step sequencer to send a program > change number (corresponding to what was mapped in the MD) every 2 > steps to the MD. But I made sure each program change switches the MD > pattern in the order that I want it (i.e. A1, A2, A3,...). So in the > end the MD sounds like it is playing a regular 16 step patterns (but > in reality it is playing across 8 different patterns, A1 thru A8 in > that order). > > 4) But then the fun comes when you engage the Rev into Remix mode. It > has the ability to playback each step in its 16 step sequencer in 127 > different combinations controlled from two rotary knobs. So for > example it could instantly re-order the playback of the patterns in > the MD (i.e. A4, A2, A2, A7, A1, A5, A5, A3). Notice that it can > trigger certain steps more than once in the same pattern, thus givng > your patterns a stutter feel, or it can change the order of only one > step. There seems to be a range in how random you want to mix things > up. So, sometimes it can sound almost too random and you need to tame > things back. Most of the time I use this technique for on-the-fly > pattern fills because you can instantly go back to the original > pattern. Another thing to note here is be strategic how you program > the fragmented pattern in the MD knowing that it will be mixed up. > Otherwise it could sound too random with no groove. > > Internally, the Rev is used for remixing the acid patterns or making > acid fills, but obviously it can be used to control external gear in > the same way. So you could use this same technique for changing up > melodies in the MnM (or anthing thing else for that matter), without > the need for program change messages. > > The down-side of this when using it this way with the MD is it is a > pattern hog. 2 steps for one pattern is kind of a waste. But if this > is the type of control you require, its necessary. Obviouly you can > make your patterns any length you want. That is why I mentioned this > would make a great CTRL-Machine for the MD. Having the ability to > remix the steps for one pattern, so that all the 2-step parts don't > have to be spread across multiple patterns. Plus, being able to do > this soley from the MD makes it more conveient plus you could utilze > the param locks to do this for you. > > BTW, for those who don't have a Revolution and are OSX based, I think > Numerology can sequence in this way and controlable via external midi > controllers along with a host of other amazing midi features. See > http://www.five12.com/numerology.html - it is worth researching. But > I'm PC-based and wondered if any one knew of something similar? I > suppose this type of remix step sequencer could be written in MAX/MSP > too of course. > > -nate > http://obliq.net > > --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "endlessnessisticman" > <moving808@e...> wrote: > > > > Can you elaborate more on how you do this with the MD? Are you able > > to change the way the MD pattern plays? Do you trigger the MD > tracks > > or patterns? What's going on? Can other sequencers do this? > > > > --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "Nathan Jantz" <nate@o...> > wrote: > > > I've had the Revolution for a few months now and have to say it is > > the best > > > sounding 303 clone I've ever heard. The ease of on-the-fly > > programming is > > > its strong point. You can program acid for days on this thing. > The > > > sequencer is simple yet so very effective. > > > > > > To keep this on topic, here is a neat trick I did with the Rev and > > MD. As > > > an experiment, I triggered patterns on the MD from the Rev using > the > > "Remix" > > > feature. The Rev can send program change messages on any given > > step. So I > > > mapped those program change numbers to pattern fragments on the > MD. > > Using > > > the Remix feature allowed me to remix my MD patterns on-the-fly > with > > good > > > results. Remember that the Rev allows for 127 variations from one > > pattern > > > at your finger tips at any point! So MD pattern mania ensued. > > > > > > BTW, I think this would make a great feature in the MD if it was > > built in as > > > a CTRL-machine (or REMIX-Machine), along with being able to trig > > patterns > > > with variation to length and offset of a pattern as I have > mentioned a > > > couple of times before on this list. Imagine being able to remix > > your MD > > > pattern with a twist of a knob or via param locks. > > > > > > -nate > > > http://obliq.net > > > > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:09:43 -0500 > > > > From: Andy Tarpinian <evildead@n...> > > > > Subject: Re: Revolution vs 777 info.... > > > > > > > > P.S. I'm about to order one, I'll let you know how it turns out. > > > > > > > > On 3/29/05 4:24 PM, "Andy Tarpinian" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some other tidbits from the Keyboard mag review. You cant > input > > notes > > > > into > > > > > the sequencer via midi keyboard :( > > > > > > > > > > And no patch memory, only sequences yay! :) > > > > > > > > > > On 3/29/05 4:01 PM, "finite_sf" wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> I just got off the phone with Jered Flickinger one of the > > founders of > > > > >> Future Retro the makers of the 777 and the Revolution. I > talked > > to him > > > > >> for about an hour, and found out some awesome info. I > thought I > > would > > > > >> pass it on as I know that there are a bunch of ppl here that > > enjoy the > > > > >> MnM sequencer, and thus would enjoy the ability to sequence a > > CV/Gate > > > > >> or din or even a MIDI synth from a MnM -> Revolution... > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> 777 two analog osc wider thus able of a wider range of sounds > (saw > > > > >> true square) > > > > >> Revolution single analog osc (saw, true 303 liquid square) > > > > >> > > > > >> Revolution has upgraded temp compensation of osc thus no > tuning > > > > >> problems > > > > >> improved the dac accuracy of note playing > > > > >> sequencer pattern shuffle > > > > >> pattern forward backward > > > > >> *remix a pattern > > > > >> effects 24 stereo 16 effects > > > > >> true analog distort > > > > >> audio input > > > > >> cv/gate > > > > >> din sync out 303 808 606 etc... > > > > >> patch select via midi > > > > >> 300 back orders... august > > > > >> 100 out
Message
Re: Revolution vs 777 info....
2005-04-01 by endlessnessisticman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.